Answer is N/A. There is not a ratio to answer the question.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The urban planner collects travel times from a random sample of 125 commuters in the San Francisco Bay Area. A traffic Study from last year claimed that the average commute time in the San Francisco Bay Area is 45 min. The urban planner will see if there is evidence the average commute time is greater than 45 minutes
( Here in this case, Null hypothesis will be Η :μ = 45
And the Alternate Hypoyhesis will be H, :μ> 45 )
C. The urban planner asks a random Sample of 100 commuters in the San Francisco Bay Area to record travel times on a Tuesday morning. One year later, the urban planner asks the same 100 commuters to record travel times on a tuesday morning . The urban planner will see the difference in commute time shows an increase.
Here in this case the null hypothesis will be, H₀ : = 0
And the Alternate Hypothesis will be H, : <0 The commute time after 1 year is more
The answer should be 13x I’m sorry if I’m wrong
Answer:
D, (1,2)
Step-by-step explanation:
It all comes down to substitution. In this case the coefficient of x is 3 and the coefficient of y is 4. The format of these coordinates being (x,y).
1. Plug in your x value (1 in this circumstance) and solve:
3(1) + 4y < 12
3 + 4y < 12
2. Plug in your y value (2 in this circumstance) and solve:
3 + 4(2) < 12
3 + 8 < 12
3. Solve
3 + 8 = 11
11 < 12
Over which interval(s) is the function decreasing?