Answer:
When Germany signed the armistice ending hostilities in the First World War on November 11, 1918, its leaders believed they were accepting a “peace without victory,” as outlined by U.S. President Woodrow Wilson in his famous Fourteen Points. But from the moment the leaders of the victorious Allied nations arrived in France for the peace conference in early 1919, the post-war reality began to diverge sharply from Wilson’s idealistic vision.
Five long months later, on June 28—exactly five years after the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his wife in Sarajevo—the leaders of the Allied and associated powers, as well as representatives from Germany, gathered in the Hall of Mirrors at the Palace of Versailles to sign the final treaty. By placing the burden of war guilt entirely on Germany, imposing harsh reparations payments and creating an increasingly unstable collection of smaller nations in Europe, the treaty would ultimately fail to resolve the underlying issues that caused war to break out in 1914, and help pave the way for another massive global conflict 20 years later.
Explanation:
Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier was a landmark decision enacted by the US Supreme Court in 1988 related to the applicability of the right of freedom of speech, granted by the First Amendment to the US Constitution, in curricular student newspapers in public schools. Lowers courts have sided unevenly with the students who sued claiming their right of freedom of speech and the school director who decided to remove two articles from the student's newspaper.
The US Supreme court ruled (and established the precedent for future cases) <u>that school authorities could exercise prior-restraint in school-sponsored channels of expression, provided that it was justified by pedagogical reasons. </u>Such student newspapers written in the schools are different from public forums for student expression where their constitutional right to freedom of speech should be guranteed with no limits.
Therefore,<u> </u><u>in the drama class described, and according to the ruling of the Supreme Court in the case detailed above</u>, the principal of the school has the right to cancel the show if he considers it to be inappropiate for the children of that age (this would serve as the required pedagogical justification) as it would be part of school-sponsored channel of expression.
Answer:
I think it was a threat but not one of the main ones
Answer: a political system used to govern the New World