The correct answer is B. Free verse poetry does not follow a set rhyme scheme or structure.
Explanation:
In poetry, free verse is an open form or it in which verses are not limited by certain aspects such as meter, which is the rhythmic structured guided by the number of syllables and combination of stress / unstressed syllables and rhyme, which is the repetition of similar sounds between verses. In this way, it is called a free verse because the poed is not restricted by certain poetic patterns and thus can create verses of the length, and rhyme he prefers. In this way, free verse poetry does not follow a set rhyme, scheme or structure.
<span>Belshazzar ruled Babylon, an intense country with a long history and a long queue of capable lords. One of those lords was Nebuchadnezzar, who had vanquished Judah, conveying the sanctuary fortunes to Babylon alongside Daniel and numerous different hostages. Belshazzar was Nebuchadnezzar's grandson through his little girl Nitocris. Belshazzar calls Nebuchadnezzar his "dad", however, this is a non-exclusive utilization of the word father, signifying "precursor."</span>
Answer: the answer that was here before me had a bunch of paragraphs
and turns out it was theres more information here lol but the last paragraphs i put in my own words hope this helpes also if theres something that bothers u with this answer plz comment down below so that i can fix it! thanks! and Peace!
so I checked this on a plagiarism site and its 31% plagiarized so i went to a paraphrasing site - https:// quillbot.com - just get rid of the space - so once i paraphrased it here i went back to the plagiarism checker and it said zero percent plagiarized, i recommend doing this before getting a bad grade, also u dont have to change the topic but it would most likely be safer
also is ur looking for a plagiarism checker don't to Grammarly takes to long lol
ok also also - here's for example the same exact paragraph just with a changed topic and phrased differently -
My peers and I debated whether schools should have healthier lunches or not. We had several different viewpoints and views on the subject in our debate. By gathering background research on the subject, I prepared for this discussion. We had debates between my party. Not all of us were in agreement with each other. I listed several factual pieces of evidence that led to my point of view: I agree that on a daily basis, schools should have healthier lunches. - Healthier lunches means healthier kids - according to an online source. Not only would it be necessary to eat healthier but it would also keep children more focused in school.
I shared with my peers this truth. Many did not agree with me, however. We remained on the topic and discussed each other politely. In order to support my opinion, I found that I needed a good understanding of the subject and background study. Overall, with my fellow peers, this was a
very efficient debate. I enjoyed discussing my experience and my opinion and describing it. As we concentrated, I felt that I was profoundly connected to my peers. I talked animatedly as I explained my reasoning. I needed their attention to be drawn. My peers and I had a fruitful debate, as you can see.
Also this paragraph is posted by muah XR - so this is just an example, remember to rephrase it and put it in your own words and to change the topic thanks!
Rising action is the answer rising action rising action
