1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Doss [256]
3 years ago
13

Why were Egyptian tombs filled with art, jewelry, and other treasures?

History
1 answer:
frozen [14]3 years ago
5 0

Answer: Egyptians believed tombs would be the safest place in the kingdom and they also believed the dead enjoyed the materials in the afterlife

Explanation: Egyptians believed they would go to the afterlife but their body had to be preserved in order to go into the afterlife so with riches in the tomb they would go to the afterlife with all of the riches and would be in the afterlife rich like they were when they were alive

You might be interested in
Which individual do these statements describe?
ELEN [110]
B. Martin Luther. Not to be mistaken with Martin Luther King
5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Hector and his friends collect baseball cards .the number of cards in each persons collection is shown below. 36, 61 ,55, 72, 47
soldi70 [24.7K]
Hello.

The range is 60.

You find range by subtracting the largest and the smallest number.

So you would do 72-12=60.

Have a nice day

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What caused world war 1?
wolverine [178]
The direct cause of WWI was the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand at Sarajevo on 28 June 1914. However historians feel that a number of factors contributed to the rivalry between the Great powers that allowed war on such a wide-scale to break out.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Essay.
Zarrin [17]

Answer:

The Supremacy Clause of the Constitution of the United States (Article VI, Clause 2), establishes that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority, constitute the "supreme Law of the Land", and thus take priority over any conflicting state laws.

hope i helped.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Based on the Supreme Court’s ruling in Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824, it would be reasonable to assume that Chief Justice John Marshall
Tanya [424]
A liberal interpretation of the constitution. <span />
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Compared with the US Constitution, how difficult is it to amend state constitutions?
    11·2 answers
  • What was the 'key belief' of the renaissance?
    6·1 answer
  • How do people use their political beliefs to try to change government?
    9·1 answer
  • What was nicholas ii's main reason for going to war with japan?
    7·1 answer
  • Why do the media sensationalize issues?
    9·2 answers
  • What is the consequence of an economically troubled middle class?
    14·1 answer
  • What country did Hitler first gain control of in his German expansion?
    7·2 answers
  • Describe Vargas’ second trip to New Mexico. How did the Pueblo’s respond?
    7·2 answers
  • Based on this document, was the Treaty of Versailles a JUST or UNJUST resolution?
    6·1 answer
  • How might the siege of Vienna (top left of map) affect how Europe viewed the Ottomans Empire?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!