Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Or, if you mean (r+3Q)/h=t:
Sample mean : \overline{x}=10.6x=10.6
Standard deviation : s=1.7s=1.7
Significance level : \alpha:1-0.95=0.05α:1−0.95=0.05
Critical value : z_{\alpha/2}=1.96
Hence the 95% confidence interval for the number of chocolate chips per cookie for big chip cookies= (10.1989,\ 11.0011)(10.1989, 11.0011)
Step 1) Convert $25 to a decimal:
0.25
Step 2) Multiply that by the amount the sandals cost.
$0.25×$45=$11.25
Step 3) Subtract from the amount you last got.
$45-$11.25=
$33.75
And there we have it! Our answer came out to $33.75.
So, with the 25% off, Sandy is now only paying $33.75 instead of $45.
Answer: There is not a good prediction for the height of the tree when it is 100 years old because the prediction given by the trend line produced by the regression calculator probably is not valid that far in the future.
Step-by-step explanation:
Years since tree was planted (x) - - - - height (y)
2 - - - - 17
3 - - - - 25
5 - - - 42
6 - - - - 47
7 - - - 54
9 - - - 69
Using a regression calculator :
The height of tree can be modeled by the equation : ŷ = 7.36X + 3.08
With y being the predicted variable; 7.36 being the slope and 3.08 as the intercept.
X is the independent variable which is used in calculating the value of y.
Predicted height when years since tree was planted(x) = 100
ŷ = 7.36X + 3.08
ŷ = 7.36(100) + 3.08
y = 736 + 3.08
y = 739.08
Forward prediction of 100 years produced by the trendline would probably give an invalid value because the trendline only models a range of 9 years prediction. However, a linear regression equation isn't the best for making prediction that far in into the future.
Answer:
true
Step-by-step explanation: