A victory over the U.S." and "access to lots of oil" are the two reasons what the <span>Soviet Union stood to gain if it controlled Afghanistan. The correct options among all the options that are given in the question are the third and the fourth options. I hope that this is the answer that has actually come to your help.</span>
There was opposition to the Revenue Act of 1763, on a basis that no one in Parliament could have foreseen.
<span>The Revenue Act, which came to be called the Sugar Act, was actually an extension of an act from 1733 called the Molasses Act. The Molasses Act required a tariff on all sugar products that were imported into America from the West Indies. The American colonists, however, had found that it was not difficult to smuggle their sugar items into the colonies and avoid the tariff that was due to the British government. This sort of activity was not allowed to go on in any other part of the British Empire, and Lord Grenville saw no reason why it should be permitted in the colonies and be winked at by England.</span>
I don't speak spanish sorry
Answer:
Early Paleoindian toolkits have superbly made artifacts of chipped stone and carved bone—projectile points, scraping and engraving tools, cutting tools known to archaeologists as spokeshaves, and toward the end of the period, axlike adzes
Answer:
Invasions by Barbarian tribes. The most straightforward theory for Western Rome's collapse pins the fall on a string of military losses sustained against outside forces. Rome had tangled with Germanic tribes for centuries, but by the 300s “barbarian” groups like the Goths had encroached beyond the Empire's borders.
Explanation:
I got you.
