<span>Cieza's relationship with the Inca empire was more civilized, in the fact that he respected the people and treated them with humanity. Bursbecq's relationship with the ottoman empire was more structured and relied highly on military and government force. It seems that Cieza had a more humanitarian relationship than Busbecq.</span>
The correct answer is C) The dismantling of the Berlin Wall and the end of restrictions on emigrating from communist countries.
A significant long-term cause of the collapse of the Soviet Union during the late twentieth century was the dismantling of the Berlin Wall and the end of restrictions on emigrating from communist countries.
After many years under the Communist regime, the Soviet Union split in December 1991. During those Communist years, the USSR never allowed private property in the Soviet United. The state was the owner of the means of production.
So when Gorbachev decided to implement glasnost and perestroika reformations, he had to carefully proceed because these involved some kind of risk. Glasnost allowed people more rights such as the freedom of speech and freedom of the press. Perestroika allowed new and private investments to revitalize the difficult economic conditions of Russia.
The Soviet Union ceased to exist on December 26, 1991. Gorbachev had resigned one day before and the new leader of Russia was Boris Yeltsin.
Answer:
Addiction and compulsion are kinds of disorders philosophers particularly refer to, but, in fact, all mental disorders, ranging from insanity to less extreme forms of psychological disorder, have some harmful effects on free will and responsibility.
Explanation:
Hope it helps ? :)
I think it should be The 3rd one. The south did farm tobacco, so I know it cant be that, and they did use slave labor more than the North, and the farm were called plantations. That leaves only the Dutch and German settlers.
<span>The government's central planning lead to a huge, complex bureaucracy that discouraged efficiency and lead to indifference. Moreover, collective farmers had no incentive to work hard.</span>