Answer and Explanation:
As per the data given in the question,
1)
Fair value per share = $20.4
Number of Share = 2 million
Fair value of award = Fair value per share ×Number of Share
= $20.4 × 2 million
= $40.8 million
2) No Entry
3)
Compensation expense($40.8 million÷4 years) $10.2 million
To Paid in capital - restricted stock($20.4-$10.2) $10.2 million
(Being the compensation expense is recorded)
4)
Fair value per share = $20.4
Share granted = 2 million
(100%-10%) forfeiture rate = 90%
fair value of award = $20.4×2×90%
= $36.72 million
The Beverage Act is the Answer
)
Answer:
Hii
This answer is only for points
Explanation:
Mark me as a brain list please
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
1. Yes.
A design defect is when the design for a particular product brings about risk or injury which could have been averted if the design was done in another way.
With regard to the question, there is a design defect as we're informed that the drain cover becomes loose and we're further told that Sta-Rite did not install safety features on its drain pumps.
2. No.
Based on the scenario in the question, the ethical duty wasn't met by Sta-Rite Industries. They neglected the potential injury and harm that their design would cause. This means that they didn't perform their ethical duty well.
3. Yes.
In this case, Sta-Rite has to compensate the affected person and a punitive damage should further be added to whatever compensation had been put in place. This will serve as a way of making others also learn and always do the right thing and be safety conscious.
Answer: General partnership.
Explanation:
Gaston has formed a general partnership with the two other business owners.
A general partnership is a business set up where two or more individuals own a business, take part in it's decision taking process and share profits equally.
