Answer:
Risk free interest rate is 5%
Y is 15.5% at a Beta of 1.5
X is 0.29 when Y is 7%
Explanation:
Risk free interest is 0.05 which 5% as given in the equation
The average expected return is given by Y
Y=0.05+0.07X
Since Beta is the same as X, when equals 1.5,Y is calculated thus
Y=0.05+0.07(1.5)
Y=0.05+0.105
Y=0.155
Y=15.5%
The value of Beta at an average return of 7% is computed thus:
7%=0.05+0.07X
where X is the unknown
0.07=0.05+0.07X
0.07-0.05=0.07X
0.02=0.07X
X=0.02/0.07
X=0.29
The scenario illustrates that the Beta, which is the risk of investment and the Y , the expected average return are positively correlated.
Answer:
There will be an increase of $6,200 , If the special order is accepted
Explanation:
For computing the net income effect first we have to find out the net income per scale which is a difference between offer purchase price and variable cost per unit
In mathematically,
Net income = Offer purchase price - variable cost per unit
where,
Offer purchase price is $35
And, the variable cost is $12 per unit plus it incur special shipping charges which is also a part of the variable cost.
So, total variable cost = variable cost per unit + Special shipping charges per scale
= $12 + $1
= $13
So, Net income is
= $15 - $13
= $2 per unit
Now for producing the 3100 scales, the net income should be multiply with the production unit
= Net income × Production unit
= 3,100 × 2
= $6,200
Fixed cost is fixed whether the production level changes or not. Thus, it is not be considered.
Hence, there will be an increase of $6,200 , If the special order is accepted
Pierre engaging in such actions is known as rationalizing.
When a person rationalizes a decision they:
- <em>T</em><em>ry to prove that what they did isn't bad </em>
- <em>C</em><em>ome up with some sort of reasoning to support their decision </em>
Pierre is clearly doing something wrong here by increasing expenses more than they are supposed to be. He however convinces himself that what he is doing is not bad because no one will notice.
He is therefore coming up with reasons to prove that what he is doing is not bad and we can conclude based on this fact that he is engaged in rationalizing his behavior.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/14453354.</em>
the price is 546
because you add all that and you get that muchh
Answer:
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Explanation:
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 is a legal framework which was passed by the 107th U.S Congress on the 30th of July, 2002. The law required that investment banking be completely made rid of research analysts who works at a broker-dealer firms, so that the analysts are not influenced to write favorable reports to enhance their potential investment banking businesses.
Hence, the legislation that requires a broker-dealer's research analysts to be completely separated from that firm's investment banking department is the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
<em>It is a law that imposes a stiffer penalty for any securities related law break offence by the accountants, auditors etc by mandating strict reforms to the existing securities regulations. </em>
