Substantive disagreement may never be resolved because it leads to clashes of opinions.
A disagreement or argument is said to be substantial if it centers on the presentation of divergent viewpoints regarding the truth or the adherence to opposing ideals.
There must be a means to distinguish substantive disagreement (SD) from conceptual disagreement if legal concepts can be the subject of SD. Arguments that persons debating a certain philosophical problem are only having a linguistic argument are one approach to reject the substantiveness of the issue. For instance, it has been argued that the seeming conflict over the mind/brain identity thesis is only a word one and that there is no real controversy over whether or not mental traits are the same as neurological ones.
To know more about Substantive disagreement refer to:
brainly.com/question/28085499
#SPJ1
Im pretty sure the answer is c if not then b
I believe that statemet is false
Most people in least industrialize nations lived in village or directly in the wild life (a lot of them do not even have enough resources for food and water). The structure of 'city' is created to cater for the explosion of labor demand that could only be exist if you're in industrialized nations
Answer:
The biggest rain forest in the world is The Amazon rainforest.
Answer:
The answer is D. Sustained attention.
Explanation:
Sustained attention is a person's ability to focus on a section of the enviroment or a selected stimulus, and maintain that focus for a prolongued period of time. It is said that the purpose of this ability is to identify any possible changes in the selected stimulus that might require our intervention. Which is why it can also be found under the name of passive monitoring or vigilance, in scientific literature.
