A traditional cover letter’s format includes an introduction, a body and a closing paragraph.
Answer:
The net income will decrease and also the total assets will also decrease
Explanation:
Here, we want to know the combined effect on net income and total assets of company that made a decision of distributing assets as a property dividend.
As the asset value is down the entry is asset (credit) and loss on asset (debit)
This will effect the net income as it will come down and total assets value also come down
Answer:
B. If both the current and accumulated E&P have deficit balances, a corporate distribution cannot be characterized as a dividend.
Explanation:
The statement written in the option B is correct.If both accumulated and current E&P have low balances,then we cannot corporate distribution as dividend rest of the options are false.Hence the answer is option B.
Answer: The motorcycle because you can sell it for more cash than the cash prize option. Value = $25000 (the price you can sell it for.)
Explanation:
Based on the scenario in the question, we've been given three options which are a new motorcycle, with an MSRP of $30000, or $20000 in cash.
The manufacturer's suggested retail price (MSRP) is simply the price that the producer of a product recommends ifor the product to be sold in retail stores.
Based on the scenario, the best option will be to choose the motorcycle. This is because it can sold for an amount that is not than the cash prize option of $20,000 since the motorcycle is valued at $25000.
Answer:
The profit is $12,500
Explanation:
The profit on the contract can be computed using the formula below:
profit/loss on the contract=(forward price-spot rate)*volume of currency sold
forward price is 1 euro to $1.20
spot price 1 euro to $1.10
volume of currency sold is Euros 125,000
profit/loss on the contract=($1.20-$1.10)*125,000
=$12,500
Invariably the trader sold each US dollar $0.10 more than the spot rate ($1.20-$1.10),when that is multiplied the volume of Euros sold,it gives $12,500 in profit.
This implies that the buyer could have bought the currency cheaper on contract date
