All categories

2 years ago

Which transformation is this an example of?

Mathematics

2 answers:

Andre45 [30]2 years ago

7 0

Answer:

B. rotation

Step-by-step explanation:

A reflection would mean that the shape would be mirrored across the y-axis or the x-axis. A translation means that nothing about the shape changes except for the location. A dilation (not an answer option but still helpful to know) is the change in size of the shape. And finally, the correct answer for this problem, a rotation means that the shape is rotated at a specific point.

I included a picture that uses a shape to help explain this idea. I hope this helps! Have a lovely day!! :)

Black_prince [1.1K]2 years ago

4 0

Rotation

explanation: reflection is a mirrored version of it.
translation is where it doesn’t change at all except for where it is.
rotation is where it flips horizontal to vertical over and over.

You might be interested in

Is it true or false that a bbinomial can have a degree of zero?

Mumz [18]

No, because any real valued term with degree 0 would be a constant. All constants in an expression can be combined into single term. Therefore if the expression were of degree 0, all the terms would be constants and could be combined into a single term making the expression a monomial.

6 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Scott has a rope 8 metres long. He says, “I need 9 pieces each 0.89 metres long.” Will Scott have enough ribbon? Explain your an

dybincka [34]

Answer:

i don't know

Step-by-step explanation:

i don't know

6 0

2 years ago

(Help me please) what can you tell about the mean of each distribution

vfiekz [6]

Answer:

The distribution is considered the mean in the problem

Step-by-step explanation:

$124.84 - $19.75 = <u>$105.09</u>

<u>If you can consider what the mean is in math: How to Find the Mean. The mean is the average of the numbers. It is easy to calculate: add up all the numbers, then divide by how many numbers there are. In other words it is the sum divided by the count.</u>

<h2><u>Have a nice day and if you could mark me as brainllest I would be happy</u></h2>

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The school paper charges $1.50 for an ad, plus 25 cents per word. Carl wants to spend only $12.00 on the ad.

statuscvo [17]

Answer:

42 words

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve just solve 0.25x +1.50 = 12.00 for x

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A. Do some research and find a city that has experienced population growth.

horrorfan [7]

A. The city we will use is Orlando, Florida, and we are going to examine its population growth from 2000 to 2010. According to the census the population of Orlando was 192,157 in 2000 and 238,300 in 2010. To examine this population growth period, we will use the standard population growth equation $N_{t} =N _{0}e^{rt}$
where:
$N(t)$ is the population after $t$ years
$N_{0}$ is the initial population
$t$ is the time in years
$r$ is the growth rate in decimal form
$e$ is the Euler's constant
We now for our investigation that $N(t)=238300$ , $N_{0} =192157$ , and $t=10$ ; lets replace those values in our equation to find $r$ :
$238300=192157e^{10r}$
$e^{10r} = \frac{238300}{192157}$
$ln(e^{10r} )=ln( \frac{238300}{192157} )$
$r= \frac{ln( \frac{238300}{192157}) }{10}$
$r=0.022$
Now lets multiply $r$ by 100% to obtain our growth rate as a percentage:
$(0.022)(100)$ =2.2%
We just show that Orlando's population has been growing at a rate of 2.2% from 2000 to 2010. Its population increased from 192,157 to 238,300 in ten years.

B. Here we will examine the population decline of Detroit, Michigan over a period of ten years: 2000 to 2010.
Population in 2000: 951,307
Population in 2010: 713,777
We know from our investigation that $N(t)=713777$ , $N_{0} =951307$ , and $t=10$ . Just like before, lets replace those values into our equation to find $r$ :
$713777=951307e^{10r}$
$e^{10r} = \frac{713777}{951307}$
$ln(e^{10r} )=ln( \frac{713777}{951307} )$
$r= \frac{ln( \frac{713777}{951307}) }{10}$
$r=-0.029$
$(-0.029)(100)$ = -2.9%.
We just show that Detroit's population has been declining at a rate of 2.2% from 2000 to 2010. Its population increased from 192,157 to 238,300 in ten years.

C. Final equation from point A: $N(t)=192157e^{0.022t}$ .
Final equation from point B: $N(t)=951307e^{-0.029t}$
Similarities: Both have an initial population and use the same Euler's constant.
Differences: In the equation from point A the exponent is positive, which means that the function is growing; whereas, in equation from point B the exponent is negative, which means that the functions is decaying.

D. To find the year in which the population of Orlando will exceed the population of Detroit, we are going equate both equations $N(t)=192157e^{0.022t}$ and $N(t)=951307e^{-0.029t}$ and solve for t:
$192157e^{0.022t} =951307e^{-0.029t}$
$\frac{192157e^{0.022t} }{951307e^{-0.029t} } =1$
$e^{0.051t} = \frac{951307}{192157}$
$ln(e^{0.051t})=ln( \frac{951307}{192157})$
$t= \frac{ln( \frac{951307}{192157}) }{0.051}$
$t=31.36$
We can conclude that if Orlando's population keeps growing at the same rate and Detroit's keeps declining at the same rate, after 31.36 years in May of 2031 Orlando's population will surpass Detroit's population.

E. Since we know that the population of Detroit as 2000 is 951307, twice that population will be $2(951307)=1902614$ . Now we can rewrite our equation as: $N(t)=1902614e^{-0.029t}$ . The last thing we need to do is equate our Orlando's population growth equation with this new one and solve for t:
$192157e^{0.022t} =1902614e^{-0.029t}$
$\frac{192157e^{0.022t} }{1902614e^{-0.029t} } =1$
$e^{0.051t} = \frac{1902614}{192157}$
$ln(e^{0.051t} )=ln( \frac{1902614}{192157} )$
$t= \frac{ln( \frac{1902614}{192157}) }{0.051}$
$t=44.95$
We can conclude that after 45 years in 2045 the population of Orlando will exceed twice the population of Detroit.

8 0

4 years ago