Well I can't see the possible sentences, but muslims were a minority in India at the time and the population was predominantly Hindu. Forcing the majority of the population to change their religion forcibly (and through that many of their core values, beliefs, traditions and practices) was a quick way to create political unrest which could lead to a revolution. They we're already a minority ruling a large and powerful nation, so they were already dealing with a lot of resistance from the population as it was. Maybe they wanted to practice tolerance for moral reasons, but more likely they just didn't want to push their luck when they were already struggling to remain popular.
Answer: D
Explanation: Both were afraid of being destroyed by a nuclear bomb
Okay, now what exactly do you not understand about this? I can go through with you and explain it
While doing research for a thesis paper about how human migration and population distribution can greatly alter or destroy the natural landscape, you come across an article discussing American settlers traveling to the Great Plains to farm. Which sentence from the article best supports your thesis?
C) Over time, the settlers who stayed were able to adapt and modify the landscape for farming.
Explanation: This sentence describes how settlers changed the landscape where they chose to settle. This supports the thesis that human migration (by the settlers) can alter the natural landscape (as settling and farming altered the landscape in the Great Plains).
Answer:
One way technology can help the production of good is, as you said, by faster transport, easy building, general expenses can be easily taken care of, and with websites, customers can have access to any sort of goods they like. so kudos, my friend, you answered your own question.
