Missouri Compromise is your answer.
Answer:
Federalists argued that the Constitution did not need a bill of rights, because the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government. Anti-Federalists held that a bill of rights was necessary to safeguard individual liberty.
Explanation:
Answer:
depends if that idea is to recreate the dinosaurs then the answer is false, but if you are thinking of more logical things, then the answer is true.
Explanation:
Answer: A condition urged by many as a requirement for legitimate government: that the authority of a government should depend on the consent of the people, as expressed by votes in elections.
:)
