I believe Pachacuti and his immediate successors: Topa Inca and Huayn Capac Inca !
Answer:
The decisions in Miranda v. Arizona, Gideon v. Wainwright, and Mapp v. Ohio are very important to defendants in criminal proceedings today because they enlarged defendants' rights in criminal trials and investigations.
Thus, Miranda v. Arizona refers to the fact that those accused of a crime must know their rights prior to being questioned by the police, that is, that everything they say can be used against them and that they have the right to consult a lawyer.
For its part, Gideon v. Wainwright guaranteed the defendants the right to have a lawyer, even when they could not afford it on their own financial means. In this way, a defendant is not left legally unprotected for not being able to afford a lawyer, since it is the state that grants him one for free.
Finally, Mapp v. Ohio prohibits the use of illegitimately obtained evidence in criminal proceedings. Thus, non-compliance with the Fourth Amendment (and the consequent search without a warrant) renders the evidence obtained in this way not admissible in court.
<span>In a free market economy the price of different products gives information about the demand and supply of the products. The price of products increases when the demand rises as there are more buyers willing to pay a larger amount for the same product. Price also goes up when the number of producers supply a smaller amount of the product as they are in a position to demand a larger amount for the same product.
Remember to hit that thanks button and rate me with 5 Stars thankyou!!!!!:)</span>
Promulgated in 1582 by Pope Gregory XIII.
The answer to your question will be D.property
