Yes, i believe there would be a benefit in teaching prisoners with philosophy
Philosophy would determine the standard that an individual has when viewing our own life. Teaching prisoners with this might change the perception that the criminals have when approaching their problems. This could prevent them from repeating the same mistakes in the future.
B. he conquered constantinople in 1451 AD
Answer:
I believe the best answers are b and c.
Explanation:
Washington mainly wanted a cabinet knowing that one president could not know everything. A cabinet was basically a debate battle between two parties. This didn't really have anything to do with military force or taxes, unless that's what the topics related to. I don't really understand answer A, is it a typo? Other than that, b and c seem correct.
Answer:
Explanation:
The possible standard ethics maintained is a little bit difficult but it an important aspect of government ethics rules. These ethics are based on universal disease condition and associated patients' needs are enhanced by the fact that the mainline western medicine disease is understood by using widely agreed-upon scientific categories. Whatever the research has done in medicine line all needs, at last, subjects.
The ethical standards also created for medical treatment. Medical technology shapes both clinical and medical diseases. Modern medicine research in effects seems able to generate medical ethics which transcends particular ethics which transcendence particular research disease, illness. Patients' and patients' related research must be treated with respect and what we called informed consent. Ethical requirements are the same in all cultures. All physical torture was banned by the government done by the physician during medical research.
Answer: Explanation:
<em> I think, therefore I am</em> or <em>Cogito ergo sum</em> was the conclusion the phylosopher René Descartes arrived after a process of meditation and some eliminaton in order to find evidence for existence. By the time he perceived that "I" (and ability to think) could be the starting point that would lead to other evidences, he no longer dreaded <em>doubts because this is also a consequence of 'I think', and evidence that 'I am'.</em>
