Wiretap Act
90-351; 6/19/68), also known as the "Wiretap Act": prohibits the unauthorized, nonconsensual interception of "wire, oral, or electronic communications" by government agencies as well as private parties, establishes procedures for obtaining warrants to authorize wiretapping by government officials, and.
The judicial model . Is the greatest of the government . Computers in the lab, judicial law. Law law , enforces god. Law is the rule.
Answer:
The answer is D, all of the above.
Explanation:
hope this helped! <3
The court's CONCLUSION in terms of decision and holding was:
- Duress is an act of coercion through the use of unlawful threats that destroys the victims free will.
<h3>What was the other decisions in the case?</h3>
Duress does not invalidate a contract that has been entered into with total view or knowledge of all the facts, and with good amount of time and opportunity that could have been used for investigation.
Note that in the Olmstead v. Saint Paul Public Schools Case the court said that there was a" total knowledge of fact, there was also reasonable time, there was an attorney" and as such, there was no scenario of duress.
Learn more about court from
brainly.com/question/341135
#SPJ12
Answer:
cross referencing the information with other sites, if the url contains .gov or .edu, check the publication date.
Explanation:
if multiple sites are saying the same thing the information is probably true, if the url contains .edu or .gov it means the information came from a university of corporation,