Answer: I HAVE NO IDEA, SORRY
Explanation:
Answer:
As used in these standards, “prosecutor” means any attorney, regardless of agency, title, or full or part-time assignment, who acts as an attorney to investigate or prosecute criminal cases or who provides legal advice regarding a criminal matter to government lawyers, agents, or offices participating in the investigation or prosecution of criminal cases. These Standards are intended to apply in any context in which a lawyer would reasonably understand that a criminal prosecution could result.
These Standards are intended to provide guidance for the professional conduct and performance of prosecutors. They are written and intended to be entirely consistent with the ABA’s Model Rules of Professional Conduct, and are not intended to modify a prosecutor's obligations under applicable rules, statutes, or the constitution. They are aspirational or describe “best practices,” and are not intended to serve as the basis for the imposition of professional discipline, to create substantive or procedural rights for accused or convicted persons, to create a standard of care for civil liability, or to serve as a predicate for a motion to suppress evidence or dismiss a charge. For purposes of consistency, these Standards sometimes include language taken from the Model Rules of Professional Conduct; but the Standards often address conduct or provide details beyond that governed by the Model Rules of Professional Conduct. No inconsistency is ever intended; and in any case a lawyer should always read and comply with the rules of professional conduct and other authorities that are binding in the specific jurisdiction or matter, including choice of law principles that may regulate the lawyer’s ethical conduct.
Because the Standards for Criminal Justice are aspirational, the words “should” or “should not” are used in these Standards, rather than mandatory phrases such as “shall” or “shall not,” to describe the conduct of lawyers that is expected or recommended under these Standards. The Standards are not intended to suggest any lesser standard of conduct than may be required by applicable mandatory rules, statutes, or other binding authorities.
https://www.americanbar.org/groups/criminal_justice/standards/ProsecutionFunctionFourthEdition/ for more info
Explanation:
Answer:
True
Explanation:
It is true that a federal tribunal can hear or solve a particular conflict by referring to the concept of justiciability. Justiciability is a term in law that refers to the limits upon legal issues over which a court can exercise its judicial authority. In other words, justiciability establishes the situations when a particular court can exercise its duties. When a court cannot provide an adequate solution to a dispute, the matter is considered not justiciable.
Answer:
She's not a reliable source
Explanation:
First, we can confirm that Gabby is a primary source because she personally experienced the event at the traffic stop. However, she is not reliable because her story about the event changes a little bit every time. For a source to be reliable, it should be consistent and state the exact facts which happened during an event.
Answer: C
Explanation: The women wouldn’t be helpful cause she thought she saw a suspect but she didn’t cause she don’t remember. if she doesn’t remember then she would be useful at all
