1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Taya2010 [7]
2 years ago
8

Which of the following is NOT true under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act? a. An intended recipient of an e-mail has th

e right to disclose it to third persons. b. An employer has the right to monitor workers’ e-mail if the monitoring occurs in the ordinary course of business or the employer provides the e-mail system. c. Internet Service Providers are not prohibited from disclosing the content of email messages to 3rd parties. d. The government has a right to access e-mail messages if it first obtains a search warrant.
Law
1 answer:
IgorC [24]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

C. Internet Service Providers are not prohibited from disclosing the content of email messages to 3rd parties

Explanation:

The Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) is a law. It prohibits tapping or capturing communication over wires. There are other state laws that cover legalities about wiretapping.

Consent is required to capture electronic communication. In some states dual consent is required while in others single consent is sufficient.

Dual consent means both of the communicating parties must agree, while single consent means that one one party should agree. Electronic Communication Act was an amendment to the Title Third of Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act (1968).

You might be interested in
If you are using your high beams at night, you should remember to do what?
alexandr402 [8]

Answer: When another car is passing lower the brightness intill they have passed, not lowering them may cause in a crash and it may be fatal

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Explain the steps in the arrest and prosecution of someone who is accused of a felony. Your response should be at least 150 word
choli [55]

Answer:

take what you need

Explanation:

Arrest

Criminal prosecution typically begins with an arrest by a police officer. A police officer may arrest a person if (1) the officer observes the person committing a crime; (2) the officer has probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed by that person; or (3) the officer makes the arrest under the authority of a valid arrest warrant. After the arrest, the police books the suspect. When the police complete the booking process, they place the suspect in custody. If the suspect commited a minor offense, the policy may issue a citation to the suspect with instructions to appear in court at a later date.

Bail

If a suspect in police custody is granted bail, the suspect may pay the bail amount in exchange for a release. Release on bail is contingent on the suspect's promise to appear at all scheduled court proceedings. Bail may be granted to a suspect immediately after booking or at a later bail review hearing. Alternatively, a suspect may be released on his "own recognizance." A suspect released on his own recognizance need not post bail, but must promise in writing to appear at all scheduled court appearances. Own recognizance release is granted after the court considers the seriousness of the offense, and the suspect's criminal record, threat to the community and ties to family and employment.

Arraignment

The suspect makes his first court appearance at the arraignment. During arraignment, the judge reads the charges filed against the defendant in the complaint and the defendant chooses to plead "guilty," "not guilty" or "no contest" to those charges. The judge will also review the defendant's bail and set dates for future proceedings.

Preliminary Hearing or Grand Jury Proceedings

The government generally brings criminal charges in one of two ways: by a "bill of information" secured by a preliminary hearing or by grand jury indictment. In the federal system, cases must be brought by indictment. States, however, are free to use either process. Both preliminary hearings and grand juries are used to establish the existence of probable cause. If there is no finding of probable cause, a defendant will not be forced to stand trial.

A preliminary hearing, or preliminary examination, is an adversarial proceeding in which counsel questions witnesses and both parties makes arguments. The judge then makes the ultimate finding of probable cause. The grand jury, on the other hand, hears only from the prosecutor. The grand jury may call their own witnesses and request that further investigations be performed. The grand jury then decides whether sufficient evidence has been presented to indict the defendant.

Pre-Trial Motions

Pre-trial motions are brought by both the prosecution and the defense in order to resolve final issues and establish what evidence and testimony will be admissible at trial.

Trial

At trial, the judge or the jury will either find the defendant guilty or not guilty. The prosecution bears the burden of proof in a criminal trial. Thus, the prosecutor must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the crimes charged. The defendant has a constitutional right to a jury trial in most criminal matters. A jury or judge makes the final determination of guilt or innocence after listening to opening and closing statements, examination and cross-examination of witnesses and jury instructions. If the jury fails to reach a unanimous verdict, the judge may declare a mistrial, and the case will either be dismissed or a new jury will be chosen. If a judge or jury finds the defendant guilty, the court will sentence the defendant.

Sentencing

During the sentencing phase of a criminal case, the court determines the appropriate punishment for the convicted defendant. In determining a suitable sentence, the court will consider a number of factors, including the nature and severity of the crime, the defendant's criminal history, the defendant's personal circumstances and the degree of remorse felt by the defendant.

Appeal

An individual convicted of a crime may ask that his or her case be reviewed by a higher court. If that court finds an error in the case or the sentence imposed, the court may reverse the conviction or find that the case should be re-tried.

4 0
3 years ago
*****
wel

Answer:

I think check and balance

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can I sue a teacher if they claim my work for themselves?
Mademuasel [1]
Yes that is plagiarism
8 0
3 years ago
How old do I look ?????????????
Mariulka [41]

Answer:

How are we sopposed to know??

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Is Governor Newsom’s proposal a proper function of state government? Why or why not and what are the likely impacts on the busin
    12·1 answer
  • A sworn officer is so called because he or she
    12·1 answer
  • Why does the us government only address certain equal protection cases?
    5·1 answer
  • The penalties for a first-time DUI charge include imprisonment for __________.
    5·1 answer
  • Is our CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM is fair? why or why not​
    9·1 answer
  • Q1.Give an example of a situation when a person might be under the impression of doing a good deed whereas he will be liable for
    13·1 answer
  • To achieve bipartisanship, what do both major parties have to do?
    5·1 answer
  • What is a statutory instrument
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following is the primary reason for using juries in trials involving serious crimes? A. It limits the effect of cor
    12·2 answers
  • According to the tenth amendment to the constitution, all powers that the constitution neither gives exclusively to the federal
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!