Answer:
Poe uses the first line of the story to build suspense in the following manner:
C. Poe informs the reader that Fortunato has wronged the narrator but doesn't say specifically what Fortunato did which creates a sense of uncertainty.
Explanation:
This question is about the short story "The Cask of Amontillado," by author Edgar Allan Poe. Take a look at how the story begins:
<em>THE thousand injuries of Fortunato I had borne as I best could, but when he ventured upon insult I vowed revenge.</em><em> You, who so well know the nature of my soul, will not suppose, however, that gave utterance to a threat. At length I would be avenged; this was a point definitely, settled --but the very definitiveness with which it was resolved precluded the idea of risk. I must not only punish but punish with impunity. A wrong is unredressed when retribution overtakes its redresser. It is equally unredressed when the avenger fails to make himself felt as such to him who has done the wrong.</em>
<u>We get to know two things from the get-go: the narrator feels that Fortunato has offended him; and the narrator is adamant about avenging himself.</u>
<u>However, at no point does the narrator reveal what Fortunato has done. Apparently, Fortunato has injured him before. Now, it is an offense. But how can we trust this narrator if he does not reveal what happened? Maybe he is too sensitive and took things too personally. Maybe nothing happened at all- he might be insane, for all we know. We are left with this uncertainty, even though the narrator tells us we know him well. We do not. He does not offer us enough information to judge for ourselves.</u>
Answer:
Yes, they have.
Explanation:
Glaciers move and when they move, they take with them sediments in their path, causing erosion.
Yffugigiivufrsrstsgfhcjvugydydcjjvjghfdyydhcnvjgydtdchjvvjyfdyfuivvifuydyfjvuvugdtyfgi
Answer:
Mental health is like a cycle because of how someone who has had mental health problems before goes back to it after recovering.
Evidence that the author uses to show the cruelty of a ruler can be inferred from the following context of the story:
''And of all princes, it is impossible for the new prince to avoid the imputation of cruelty, owing to new states being full of dangers. Hence Virgil, through the mouth of Dido, excuses the inhumanity of her reign owing to its being new, saying:
"Res dura, et regni novitas me talia cogunt
Moliri, et late fines custode tueri."(*)
Option C is the correct answer.
<h3>What is the evidence?</h3>
Evidence is something that supports the claims being raised by the accused party over the defending party.
The evidence from the passage where the author says that it is impossible for the new kings to ignore the cruelty when there is danger from the new states. This leads to the inhumanity being excused by Virgil in her ruling.
Therefore, the explanation given in part C is the evidence that the author uses to show the cruelty of the new kings.
Learn more about the logical evidence in the related link
brainly.com/question/25915441
#SPJ1
