Answer:
<em>Adult Acts:</em>
<em>Adults are prosecuted for “committing crimes”. </em>
<em>Juvenile Acts:</em>
<em>juveniles are prosecuted for committing “delinquent acts.” Many states classify juvenile offenders as those who are between the ages of ten and eighteen. In other words, anyone under eighteen is a juvenile, but you must be at least ten years of age to enter into the juvenile justice system. In other states, however, the age at which an offender is treated as an adult may be as young as sixteen or seventeen</em>
Explanation:
Answer:
The exclusionary rule prevents the government from using most evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution. The decision in Mapp v. Ohio established that the exclusionary rule applies to evidence gained from an unreasonable search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The decision in Miranda v. Arizona established that the exclusionary rule applies to improperly elicited self-incriminatory statements gathered in violation of the Fifth Amendment, and to evidence gained in situations where the government violated the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel. However, the rule does not apply in civil cases, including deportation hearings. See INS v. Lopez-Mendoza.
Answer:
The correct matching sequence of the items is as follow:
1. negate, destroy ⇒ a. nullify
2. guideline document in judicial review ⇒ c. u.s. constitution
3. chosen, appointed ⇒ e. nominated
4. head of Armed Forces ⇒ b. president
5. interprets the meaning of laws and administrative rules
and regulations ⇒ d. statutory construction
6. gives power to the judicial system of courts ⇒ f. article III of the constitution
Explanation:
- Nullify means to negate and destroy.
- The constitution refer to the guideline document in judicial review.
- Nominate means to appoint or chose.
- According to Law, the president of the United States is president.
- Statutory construction means interpreting the meaning of laws and administrative rules and regulations.
- Article III of the constitution gives power to the judicial system of courts.
Answer:
well talk to them about it, explain the situation to the manager and demand an explaination back
Answer:
Suzy is expected to be charged with attempted murder.
Explanation:
Suzy showed a strong intention to kill her husband, even though her plan failed and she was unable to actually kill her. For this reason, she should be charged with attempted murder and since there is direct evidence that she wanted to kill Bob, it is likely that she would be convicted, even without actually carrying out the crime.
This accusation would be prevalent, even if Suzi had not caused Bob any injuries or injuries.
