The supreme court ruled in Katz vs United States expands the fourth amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures to cover electronic wiretaps.
Explanation:
Katz found guilty because of illegal gambling and the appellate court found that there was no physical intrusion into the phone booth and there was no need for warrant.
The supreme court uses a wiretap to intercept a private telephone conversation and was not a search for fourth amendment.
The majority opinion of Katz vs United States had overturned the court of appeals affirmation of the conviction.
The fourth amendment is the bill of rights of constitution that protects people from unlawful searches and occupation.
Answer: C
Explanation: The women wouldn’t be helpful cause she thought she saw a suspect but she didn’t cause she don’t remember. if she doesn’t remember then she would be useful at all
Answer:
The Police Department, with 91 sworn officers, three Reserve officers, and 17 non-sworn employees, provides law-enforcement and animal control services throughout its 27 square miles of primarily residential property.
I would not follow my partners instructions. When you are in law you have to always tell the truth even if that means hurting another person who you are close to because of their wrongdoing . If you go along with the lying then that makes you almost as bad as the suspect.
