All categories

2 years ago

25 points to anybody who can solve this pls!

Mathematics

2 answers:

Gre4nikov [31]2 years ago

8 0

Answer:

Q=(2,4)

R=(3,1)

S=(5,3)

Step-by-step explanation:

The x value stays the same when reflecting in the x axis

And the y value would be an equal distance from the y-axis for all coordinates so you would make -4 into 4 ecause they are both 4 away from the y-axis line.

Please give brainliest :)

Svetach [21]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Q' (2,4)

R' (3,1)

S' (5,3)

Step-by-step explanation:

When reflected across x-axis, the x-values stay the same but y-values change signs. Because you count how many points till the reflection line then same amount you have to go to the other side. But since it is saying x-axis, the reflection line is on x=0 so you just change the sign.

You might be interested in

How do u message on here

iren [92.7K]

Answer:

You have to get to a specific level you move levels by answering questions for people!

HOPE THIS HELPED!!!!!!!!!!!!!XDDDDDD

4 0

2 years ago

Which statement is true about the prime polynomial 2x2 + 3x + 3?

dedylja [7]

Answer:

It cannot be modeled with a rectangle.

Step-by-step explanation:

The given expression 2x^2 + 3x +3 cannot be factored.

That means that it cannot be modeled with a rectangle.

So your answer is, It cannot be modeled with a rectangle.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Toxaphene is an insecticide that has been identified as a pollutant in the Great Lakes ecosystem. To investigate the effect of t

Likurg_2 [28]

Answer:

This data suggest that there is more variability in low-dose weight gains than in control weight gains.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let $\sigma_{1}^{2}$ be the variance for the population of weight gains for rats given a low dose, and $\sigma_{2}^{2}$ the variance for the population of weight gains for control rats whose diet did not include the insecticide.

We want to test $H_{0}: \sigma_{1}^{2} = \sigma_{2}^{2}$ vs $H_{1}: \sigma_{1}^{2} > \sigma_{2}^{2}$ . We have that the sample standard deviation for $n_{2} = 22$ female control rats was $s_{2} = 28$ g and for $n_{1} = 18$ female low-dose rats was $s_{1} = 51$ g. So, we have observed the value

$F = \frac{s_{1}^{2}}{s_{2}^{2}} = \frac{(51)^{2}}{(28)^{2}} = 3.3176$ which comes from a F distribution with $n_{1} - 1 = 18 - 1 = 17$ degrees of freedom (numerator) and $n_{2} - 1 = 22 - 1 = 21$ degrees of freedom (denominator).

As we want carry out a test of hypothesis at the significance level of 0.05, we should find the 95th quantile of the F distribution with 17 and 21 degrees of freedom, this value is 2.1389. The rejection region is given by {F > 2.1389}, because the observed value is 3.3176 > 2.1389, we reject the null hypothesis. So, this data suggest that there is more variability in low-dose weight gains than in control weight gains.

8 0

3 years ago

Are the following expression equivalent? Please show your work 3xy^2/4y and 6xy^2/8xy

Daniel [21]

No because the second one have an x on the denominator, but the first one doesn't

7 0

3 years ago

Four thousand divided by 10 equal hundred divided ten

Alexeev081 [22]

I am quite confused what this problem asks about.

We are given that:

4,000 / 10 is equal to hundred / 10

I believe this problem is asking us how much in hundreds is 4,000

Therefore the answer is: 40

Such that:

<span>4,000 / 10 = 40 hundreds / 10</span>

8 0

3 years ago