Answer:
His purpose is to convince readers not to lie.
Explanation:
Answer:
Statement that best explains the difference in viewpoint in the Greenberg interview from that in the informational text on Thurgood Marshall is Option D: The Greenberg interview provides an insider's view of the Brown vs. Board of Education case; the perspective of the informational article is more distant.
Explanation:
Brown v. Board of Education case was a decision which set benchmark in Supreme Court of U.S. It ruled that the state laws which establish racial discrimination in public schools are unconstitutional.
Thurgood Marshall was an American lawyer in the Supreme Court of the United States. Other given option are incorrect. Greenberg gave personal knowledge of Thurgood Marshall and about the case but the informational article was only based on research.
Greenberg interview gave important details while article was based only on research.
1. <span>That company has been making surfboards since the 1960s. - <u>present perfect progressive</u> (present perfect of the verb to be = have/has been + verb + ing)
2. </span><span>Hunter had been playing a video game when his computer crashed. - <u>past perfect progressive</u> (past perfect of the verb to be = had been + verb + ing)
3. </span><span>As of next month, my best friend and I will have known each other for 12 years. - there is a mistake in options here, the correct answer is <u>future perfect</u>, not future perfect progressive (that would be will have knowing). </span>
Parallel structure: means using the same pattern of words to show that two or more ideas have the same level of importance in the sentence
so maybe ... " but the good introduction she had been writing all night did not meet her standards "
I'm not 100% sure on my parallel structured ending suggestion.lol
