Answer:
No. In an 8-1 decision authored by Chief Justice Morrison Waite, the Court concluded that the relevant sections of the Enforcement Act lacked the necessary, limiting language to qualify as enforcement of the Fifteenth Amendment. The Chief Justice first stated that the Fifteenth Amendment "does not confer the right of suffrage upon any one," but "prevents the States, or the United States, however, from giving preference…to one citizen of the United States over another on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude." In examining the language of the Enforcement Act, the Court noted that, while the first two sections of the act explicitly referred to race in criminalizing interference with the right to vote, the relevant third and fourth sections refer only to the "aforesaid" offense. According to the Court, this language does not sufficiently tailor the law to qualify as "appropriate legislation" under the Enforcement Clause of the Fifteenth Amendment.
Explanation:
Answer:
<h2>Yes</h2>
Explanation:
The color of your skin should have nothing to do with justice.
I'm always happy to help :)
Answer:
Fear that the Continental Congress would control the colonies as the British Parliament had; thus it had difficulty enlisting soldiers and raising money. ... Many political disputes revolve around economics and especially the impact that money has on everyone's daily lives.
Explanation:
One of the reasons why Buddhism was especially supportive of printing technology was because "<span>b. Buddhism was fighting with Christianity for converts and saw pamphlets and flyers as a way to attract followers," since this allowed for the message to be more easily spread. </span>
