Case Study 2: Maxing out Matched Savings

Mathematics

1 answer:

zhuklara [117]1 year ago

4 0

Answer:

The computation of the given question is shown below:-

Total Contributions = Monthly contribution + Amount invested in Ferdinand’s 401(k)

= $250 + $125

= $375

1. Future Value = PMT [((1 + r)n - 1) ÷ r

Future value = 375 × ((1 + 0.03 ÷ 12) × 12 × 40 - 1) ÷ (0.03 ÷ 12)

= $347,272

2. Ferdinand deposit = Given Amount × Total number of months in a year × Number of years

= $250 × 12 Months × 40 Years

= $120,000

3. The Amount put in by the employer = 50% of $250 ×Total number of months in a year × Number of years

= $125 × 12 Months × 40 Years

= $60,000

4. Interest = Future value - Ferdinand deposit - The Amount put in by the employer

= $347,272 - $120,000 - $60,000

= $167,272

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in

Identify the domain of the exponential function shown in the following graph:

Advocard [28]

All real numbers is the correct answer.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The district manager of four different restaurants wanted to investigate whether the four restaurants differed with respect to c

Alex_Xolod [135]

Answer:

Hello your question is incomplete attached below is the complete question

answer : There is not convincing statistical evidence to suggest that the proportion of customers who order dessert at each restaurant is not the same based on family classification. ( E )

Step-by-step explanation:

To arrive at this conclusion we will determine the Null and alternate hypothesis

H0 : Number that orders dessert is same based on family classification given

Ha : Number that orders dessert is not the same based on family classification given

from the question the p-value of Chi-square test is 0.092 > 0.05 hence we will fail to reject the null hypothesis. therefore we can conclude that

There is not convincing statistical evidence to suggest that the proportion of customers who order dessert at each restaurant is not the same based on family classification