Answer:
The answer to the question is;
Yes, it is very significant as the number of of observed vaccinated children is below the number of actually vaccinated children by 78.
Step-by-step explanation:
The result of the survey of more than 13,000 children indicate that only 89.4 % had actually been and the P-value indicate that the chance of having a sample proportion of 89.4 % vaccinated is 1.1 %.
P is low at 0.011 for which however the proportion of those vaccinated is between 0.889 and 0.899 using a 95% confidence interval, whereby the decrease from 90 % believed to 89.9 % is small, albeit it depends on the size of the population.
At 89.4 %, in a sample of 13,000, the number of children expected to have been vaccinated but were missed is equal to 90 - 89.4 = 0.6 % = 0.006
Therefore the children missed = 78 children which is significant.
The best choices are table 1.
All the input values are being multiplied by themselves by the output values.
This creates a congruent and linear correlation and congruence.
I hope this helps!
Brainliest answer is always appreciated!
Answer:
there are agario clans now?
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
a. f(-1)=12
b. f(2t)=16t²-6t+5
c. f(t-2)=4t²-19t+27
Step-by-step explanation:
For a, b, c, we are given an input. We plug that into f(x) to find our answers.
a. f(-1)=12
f(-1)=4(-1)²-3(-1)+5
f(-1)=4+3+5
f(-1)=12
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
b. f(2t)=16t²-6t+5
f(2t)=4(2t)²-3(2t)+5
f(2t)=4(4t²)-6t+5
f(2t)=16t²-6t+5
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
c. f(t-2)=4t²-19t+27
f(t-2)=4(t-2)²-3(t-2)+5
f(t-2)=4(t²-4t+4)-3t+6+5
f(t-2)=4t²-16t+16-3t+6+5
f(t-2)=4t²-19t+27
You have to put the answer so we can help you or at least try and help you out
