<u><em>Answer:</em></u>
<u><em>No Answere found sry.</em></u>
<u><em>Personal thoughts:</em></u>
<u><em>Well researched and found nothing even looked in a civics book really sorry. If I get an answere I will give my feed and thank you for understanding.</em></u>
<u><em>Explanation:</em></u>
<u><em>Researched and found this info. Not sure if it is 100% right but took time out of my rest to find out and try to help someone. Sorry if iḿ wrong.</em></u>
What are the answer choices
Sphere of influence an outside claims trading privileges and protectorate have their own government
Televisions is the answer.
The line of reasoning illustrates the<span> sunk-cost fallacy.
Basically, the money and lives in the war were already invested. The idea behind it is that if you leave the war then it will all be in vain. Since it was already invested, then there's no reason to leave the war since the costs have to be returned and his idea would be that by staying in the war you might win and then have the benefits that outdo the costs.</span>