Step-by-step explanation:
Scatter plots are dots scattered all over the graph. I think that this is the easiest graph because all you need to do is put a dot where you want it.
A scatter plot doesn't need any lines, all it needs is dots.
Let's solve your equation step-by-step.<span><span><span>0.2<span>(<span>x+50</span>)</span></span>−6</span>=<span>0.4<span>(<span><span>3x</span>+20</span>)</span></span></span>Step 1: Simplify both sides of the equation.<span><span><span>0.2<span>(<span>x+50</span>)</span></span>−6</span>=<span>0.4<span>(<span><span>3x</span>+20</span>)</span></span></span><span><span><span><span><span><span>(0.2)</span><span>(x)</span></span>+<span><span>(0.2)</span><span>(50)</span></span></span>+</span>−6</span>=<span><span><span>(0.4)</span><span>(<span>3x</span>)</span></span>+<span><span>(0.4)</span><span>(20)</span></span></span></span>(Distribute)<span><span><span><span><span>0.2x</span>+10</span>+</span>−6</span>=<span><span>1.2x</span>+8</span></span><span><span><span>(<span>0.2x</span>)</span>+<span>(<span>10+<span>−6</span></span>)</span></span>=<span><span>1.2x</span>+8</span></span>(Combine Like Terms)<span><span><span>0.2x</span>+4</span>=<span><span>1.2x</span>+8</span></span><span><span><span>0.2x</span>+4</span>=<span><span>1.2x</span>+8</span></span>Step 2: Subtract 1.2x from both sides.<span><span><span><span>0.2x</span>+4</span>−<span>1.2x</span></span>=<span><span><span>1.2x</span>+8</span>−<span>1.2x</span></span></span><span><span><span>−<span>1x</span></span>+4</span>=8</span>Step 3: Subtract 4 from both sides.<span><span><span><span>−<span>1x</span></span>+4</span>−4</span>=<span>8−4</span></span><span><span>−<span>1x</span></span>=4</span>Step 4: Divide both sides by -1.<span><span><span>−<span>1x</span></span><span>−1</span></span>=<span>4<span>−1</span></span></span><span>x=<span>−4</span></span>Answer:<span>x=<span>−<span>4</span></span></span>
Answer:
this will probably help
Step-by-step explanation:
Only Statement 2 is surely correct.
because there maybe chances that the line L1 and L3 lies above the line L2 and they can also fulfill the condition of perpendicularity so we can't be sure about statement 3 & statement 1 is clearly incorrect