People should not pay taxes if they disagree with how the government is spending their money but in doing so it breaks the social contract described by many thinkers during the period of Enlightenment. In the case of wishing to not pay taxes, no government services should be available to the person, nor should they be able to function within the society where others are paying taxes. If one wishes to live their own life not paying taxes and not hurting anyway, there is no ethical or moral reason for them not to do such. However it is important to understand there is no middle ground, not paying taxes and still benefitting from a society.
Answer:
Explanation:
the landmark 2015 supreme court case obergefell v. hodges legalized what in the united states
Answer:
Financial literacy as essential equipment to secure hacking and theft practices
Explanation:
Some of the measures to be taken are there should be the introduction of the use of ATM cards and allied stuffs in connection to financial matters for every individual
Step 1: The bill is drafted
Step 2: The bill is introduced
Step 3: The bill goes to committee
Step 4: Subcommittee review of the bill
Step 5: Committee mark up of the bill
Step 6: Voting by the full chamber on the bill
Step 7: Referral of the bill to the other chamber
Step 8: The bill goes to the president
Step 9: Overriding a veto
If the President vetoes a bill, Congress may attempt to override the veto. If both the Senate and the House pass the bill by a two-thirds majority, the President's veto is overruled, and the bill becomes a law.
Answer:
Two ways in which laws protect citizens against possible human rights violations are, on the one hand, the explicit recognition of the natural rights to life, liberty and private property as fundamental pillars of the legal systems of each country and , on the other, the establishment of sanctions (such as imprisonment, fines, or even capital punishment, among others) for the eventual violation of these rights.
