When did campaign finance regulation begin in the United States?

1 answer:

3 0

After the Federal Election Campaign Act was amended in 1974 to impose limitations on contributions from individuals, political parties, and PACs, campaign finance regulation was established in the United States.

<h3>Which of the following was a significant outcome of the Federal Election Campaign Act between 1971 and 1974?</h3>

In order to ensure better openness of funds made to federal campaigns, the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 established federal law in the United States. To impose monetary restrictions on their contributions, it was later updated in 1974. In accordance with the legislation, the Federal Election Commission was also created.

<h3>The Federal Election Commission did what?</h3>

The Federal Election Commission is an independent regulatory organization entrusted with monitoring and upholding federal campaign finance laws (FEC).

To know more about campaign finance regulation visit:

brainly.com/question/29543360

#SPJ4

You might be interested in

Now write a CV with Cover Letter to the Head of the Department of Bangladesh House Building Finance Corporation for the post adv

Darina [25.2K]

To, The Head of Finance

Dear Sir,

I have recently seen your advertisement regarding the vacant post in the finance department of your organization. I am CFA and has recently started pursuing MBA finance to enhance my skills and professional knowledge.

I have more than 3 years of experience in the field of finance and have achieved employee star award for my exceptional performance.

I have enclosed my CV for your reference.

CV Sample

Huma Saeed +471 26 555 257

Professional experience :

Bank al Hamra 2016 - 2018

Michael page 2018 - present

Qualification:

Bachelors 2014

CFA 2015-2017

MBA 2017 - Present

Learn more at brainly.com/question/24374352

3 0

3 years ago

the supreme court case new jersey v TLO questioned the right students had in public schools. tlo was a new jersey high school st

Oksanka [162]

The SCOTUS did not rule that T.L.O’s 4th amendment (searches and seizures) rights had been violated. They ruled that the school administrations search of the bag was reasonable under the circumstances (i.e T.L.O. Being a minor and on school property, meaning that while at school, administration is responsible for the well-being and safety of all students, thus allowing them to search T.L.O’s bag for marijuana). A good way to think of it is that while you’re at school, the administration acts as your parents. Your parents don’t need a warrant to search through your room and neither does the administration if you are on school property. The 4th amendment applies to this case because it protects against unlawful searches and seizures (i.e. searches and seizures that are without a warrant). The constitutional question was whether or not T.L.O. Could be charged with a crime/punished or not because the school administration did not have a warrant. However, because the school administration was acting as a loco parentis (latin term for “in place of the parent”) they did not need a warrant to search her bag. Hope this helped!

8 0

3 years ago

Each frivolous or malicious lawsuit or appeal that an inmate files counts as a _______against the inmate.

agasfer [191]

Answer:

strike

Explanation:

Each frivolous or malicious lawsuit or appeal that an inmate files counts as a strike against the inmate.

5 0

3 years ago

Just testing this out, is this working?

nexus9112 [7]