Answer:
10.52 years
Explanation:
We can work out the number of years using this relationship
V =P× (1+r)^n
V= tribe valeu = 3×3.5 = 10.5
r-growth rate -11%
n- number of years- ?
10.5 = 3.5× (1.11)^n
<em>dividing both sides by 1.11^n</em>
1.11^n = 10.5/3.5
<em>taking the log of both sides</em>
n log 1.11 = log 3
n = log 3/log 1.11
n =10.52
Answer:
Explanation:
30 - 21 = 9 years
r = 3% inflation
FV = 25,000
We know that FV = PV(1+r)^n
25,000 = PV(1+0.03)^9
PV = 25,000/ 1.3047731
PV = 19,160.42, this is how much it worth today
Answer:
C. A giant mixing container costs twice as much to operate as a small one but can mix 6 times as much dough daily
Explanation:
Economies of scale refers to a state when increase in the output results out of lower average costs. The operation of such a phase results out of, the total cost getting spread over large number of units of production in the long run.
Economies of scale results when the operations of a business expand due to which a firm can buy in bulk, avail more discounts and concessions from the seller for inputs and the efficiency of the labor rises.
In the given case, if the bakery decides to purchase a giant mixing container, it might lead to economies of scale given the fact, with respect to costs, the revenues shall rise more.
Since the giant mixer is capable of mixing six times as much dough daily, it would lead to a reduction in the average cost accompanied by an increase in the output and thereby lead to economies of scale.
Answer:
Implicit Imputed opportunity cost of time sacrifised while airport drop .
Explanation:
My friend asking me to drop at airport, & paying costs : gas used while driving, parking cost of car - has excluded certain price giving aspects.
He has included all the Explicitly quantified costs , whose payment is made to third person - like fuel & parking.
However, he has not included the implicit cost in terms of opportunity cost i.e other things sacrifised while going to drop him. Such costs payment is although not directly made to third person, but they still reflect a 'cost' as they reflect a gain sacrifised meanwhile.
In this case, it includes time sacrifised while going to drop friend at airport. That time could be used at work, which could have monetary benefits. So, this cost is eliminated to be evaluated by my friend.
Answer:
The person should do whatever impacts his/her company or organization in a good way.
Explanation:
Sometimes facing ethical decisions could be hard, but usually in business everyone is selfish.
If you have any questions feel free to ask in the comments - Mark
Also when you have the chance please mark me brainliest.
