Answer:
Ending inventory as at 31 December = $1500
Explanation:
First-In-First-Out is a method of inventory valuation whereby the stock that comes in first, is used first. This is common for inventory consisting of perishables, such as vegetables where if not used/sold soon, it would be wasted.
Jan 31: Purchases = $20 x 100 units = $2000
<em><u>Remaining inventory:</u></em>
$20 x 100 units = $2000
Feb 28: Purchases = $30 x 100 units = $3000
<em><u>Remaining inventory:</u></em>
$20 x 100 units = $2000
$30 x 100 units = $3000
<em><u>Sales = 150 units x $45:</u></em>
$20 x 100 units = $2000
$30 x 50 units = $1500
<em><u>Remaining inventory</u></em>
200 - 150 = 50 units x $30 = $1500
<em>Thus,</em>
Cost of Goods Sold = $3500 ($2000 + $1500)
Ending inventory as at 31 December = $1500
The answer is customer value analysis. This is responsible
for providing information in regards with the organization’s way of how they
are able to maintain or work well with their competitions and to their
customers. This is considered to be important because it provided a basis and
comparison with the rivals existing in the organizations.
Answer:
still be liable for Hala's contract.
Explanation:
Any contract entered into by any of the partners, before the dissolution of a partnership business is deemed legal hence binding on the partners. This means that the partners will still be liable for the new contract in line with their partnership status.
Although, before a partnership business can be dissolved, at least one of partners must give a notice of intent. If in the process of giving the notice, another member enters in a new contract, such will be valid and partners will still be held liable because the business has still not been dissolved in the eye of the law.
Any contract entered into by any partner in a partnership business aftet dissution becomes illegal hence not binding on other members.
Answer:
thx fpr the 50 bro and can i get brainliest i need one more
Explanation:
This is an example of Tying rewards and incentives directly to the achievement of strategic and financial targets.
By doing this, general Electric aimed to create an objective measurement for all of its emloyees that motivate them to keep increasing their performance if they hope to stay as an employee in that company. Through this method, Jack Welch managed to increase the company's value for around 4000% during 20 years of his reign.
