The correct answer is Rights View of Ethics.
<u>Rights-based ethics</u> is a concept whereby all humans have rights based only on the fact that they are human. These rights are natural rights (moral ones) and conventional rights as created by the society in which that person lives in (different values). The opposite of rights based ethics are<u> utilitarian ethics</u>, which are based on the maximization of "good outcomes" and minimizations of "bad outcomes." An example of a rights-based ethics is: The right to freely practice a religion of choice; an example of an utilitarian ethics is: that it would be acceptable to torture someone to gain information to save others as it would have a positive net outcome.
Answer:
The carnival is most likely to win because it does not have the obligation of protecting a customer from something that they did not do and could not foresee.
Explanation:
As the robbery is an event that has not occurred before at the carnival, the carnival's owner could not foresee it, nor has the owner knowledge of this robbery taking place. So the business does not have the duty of protecting their clients from external things, in other words, from third parties, mostly when they could not predict it. For these reasons, the carnival has a higher probability of winning the case.
It could be because of how big it was
