Answer:
The author gives us multiple examples of how Bigfoot could actually exist. (S)he talked about how many have heard the creature's cries and seen the footprints. The author explained that, though Wallace's family said that it was a made-up joke, there is no explanation for the other sightings of Bigfoot people who have promised to be seen.
Explanation:
Hope this helps!
Answer:
D
Explanation: By saying that the dust was once a man, he is saying no one remembers Lincoln, what used to be a great and powerful man, is now dust, forgotten and insignificant.
New York City constantly has flashing billboards, bright windows, loud events, and people from all around the world coming all the time, all day long.
Answer:
The personification in this sentence suggests that the lighthouse horn sounded and was heard by the sailors who were in the fog which could help them to find their way.
Explanation:
Personification is giving something (like sound) a human like quality (like traveling).
<span>Q1: The ability of an ecosystem to recover from damage.
In the text, it says "the resiliency of the reefs". From this we know that resiliency is a trait that the reefs have. In the next sentence, we see the context clues that define resiliency when it states "reefs bounce back-even flourish." When someone or something bounces back it recovers and returns to it's previous state.
Q2: to inform readers about how the coral reefs are being destroyed AND to convince readers that practices that destroy coral reefs must be stopped.
It is a "Check All That Apply" so more than one answer can be chosen. The passage title is "Save the Coral Reefs" and the selection ends with the sentence "More can be done now to help the coral reefs bounce back". These clues tell the reader that the author's purpose is to save the reefs. In order to do this the author needs to first explain how the reefs are being destroyed. Then convince readers to save the reefs by stopping the practices that destroy them.
Q3: "could help save" and "unsubstantiated risks".
It is important to pay attention to the question here. It is asking for phrases that support safety - not necessarily nutrition. A pixie stick is safe to eat, but not nutritious. The phrase "could help save" supports the idea that it is safe because it is being defined as possibly life and eye-saving. "Unsubstantiated risks" also shows safety because it state that any risks have not been proven and are therefore unfounded. Some of the other phrases such as "more vitamin A" and "more nutritious" support the argument that the food is healthier but are not used to specifically explain how safe it is.</span>
