Answer:
A
Explanation:
To answer the question, we look at an extreme scenario of 0% interest rate and see the minimum repayment Jade will make on the loan taken
Therefore,
Interest Rate = 0%
This means that the loan to be paid will be calculated as follows
Monthly payments x 12 Months x 14 Years
= $195 x 12 months x 14 years = $32, 760
The meaning of this outcome is that the lower the interest rate to be paid, the higher the size of the loan, because at 2.9% the loan= $26,898.98 and at 0% rate the loan= $32, 760.
The conclusion therefore is a 2.7% interest rate which is lower than 2.9% but not as low as the extreme 0% will cause the loan amount to be higher than $26,898.98. This affirms option A.
Options B and C are wrong because 2.5% and 2.3% are lower than 2.9%, therefore, the loan amount will be higher. Option D is also wrong because a 3.1% interest rate is higher than 2.9%, therefore, the amount should be lower not higher than $26,898.98
Answer:
-value of all goods and services produced in the economy this year
-this year's prices
-value of all goods and services produced in the economy this year
-the base year's prices
-bought by consumers
-the first scenario would have effect on the GDP deflator
-the second scenario would have effect on the GDP deflator
Explanation:
The GDP deflator is used in measuring inflation in the economy by measuring changes in prices of goods in the economy. It is used together with other indices such as consumer price index in arriving at a more accurate or balanced measurement of inflation I'm the economy. The GDP deflator would be affected above because it is more comprehensive in it's calculation or measurement as it doesn't take into account only a basket of goods and services like the Consumer price index does
Answer:
Judy may deduct $54,000 of the net losses.
Explanation:
2018 Passive Activity Limitations $39,500
Passive Income ($33,500) – loss allowed to the extent of passive income
Suspended Passive Activity Limitations $6,000
2019 Passive Activity Limitations $69,500
Passive Income ($21,500) – loss allowed to the extent of passive income
Suspended Passive Activity Limitations $48,000
$54,000 Suspended Passive Activity Limitations
The last one is definitely not the answer. I am also trying to figure this out but I know for a fact the last one isin't, I think it is the 3rd option! i looked up the defenitions of the others and the one that seems right is the 3rd. Goodluck!
Answer:
positively.
Explanation:
The <u><em>correlation </em></u>between education and income is positive a more educated person will always have a better income than one that is not. But along the statistical distribution of this<u><em> correlation</em></u> there are people that <u><em>deviate </em></u>for the curve <u><em>(standar deviation)</em></u> and even though they are educated they do not earn as much money to others that have the same level of education.
