Answer:
goodwill
Explanation:
As we know that the intangible assets are those assets which cannot be seen or even touched
It involved the assets such as patent, goodwill, trademark, franchisee, etc
But the asset which cannot be identifiable is goodwill
Therefore as per the given situation, the goodwill is the correct option
Hence, the second option is correct
Answer:
c. a patent should be amortized over the shorter of the inventor's life or its economic life
Explanation:
Which of the following statements concerning intangibles is true?
a. a copyright should be considered an intangible with an indefinite life
b. organization costs must be expensed as incurred
c. a patent should be amortized over the shorter of the inventor's life or its economic life
d. the registration of a trademark or tradename lasts for 20 years and is non-renewable
Patents are a right granted to an inventor to exclusively sell a product for a specific period of time usually for 20 years. During this period, others are prevented from making, using, or selling the invention. A patent should be amortized over the shorter of the inventor's life or its economic life.
Types of patents include:
1. utility patents
2. design patents
3. plant patent
Copyright gives the inventor of a product and anyone they give the permission to the right to reproduce the product. Copyrights have limited lives
Answer:
Mark me Brainliest
Explanation:
A business office is one which is established by the individuals or governments for the production and distribution of goods and services with a view of earning money by satisfying the consumers.
Answer:
Explanation:
I will give a basic hint to understanding this problem
Prevailing technique or what is best known as "Dominant Strategy" is an activity profile that is best for a specific player review of what different players are picking. for this situation there is no prevailing procedure for any player on the grounds that there is no single activity profile that expands the result for any player.
So we can say from this observations that the following is valid;
- A doesn't have a dominant strategy
- B doesn't have a dominant strategy
There are two Nash equilibria for this situation. Both the organizations are charging a low cost and both the organizations are charging a significant expense.
As such they can augment their benefit given what the adversary is doing.
I hope this explains the observation seen.
cheers I hope this helps