All categories

2 years ago

Which scenario most strongly indicates that workplace rules will have to be changed to resolve the conflict

1 answer:

5 0

The scenario that show workplace rules need to be changed is Workers voting to disband their union because they feel that it has not adequately represent their interest.

<h3>What is a workplace?</h3>

A workplace is a designated location or place where employees of and employer work or a place where workers perform their designated duties.

Therefore, The scenario that indicate workplace rules need to be changed to resolve conflict is Workers voting to disband their union because they feel that it has not adequately represent their interest.

The question is incomplete are the options were not given.

Here are the options from another website.

A lack of deadlines for research staff, preventing other staff members from getting information in a timely fashion
Line workers and executives not eating together at lunch, except for onescheduled day each month
An employee threatening to quit, because he did not get a raise that he hadcounted on and believed he deserved
Workers voting to disband their union because they feel that it has not adequately represent their interest.

Learn more about workplace below.

brainly.com/question/1249474

You might be interested in

Oxford, Inc., which uses a process-cost accounting system, began operations on January 1 of the current year. The company incurs

Nookie1986 [14]

Answer:

3,000 physical units in the production

Explanation:

Given that,

Oxford started work on 3,000 units during the period

Units were 70% of the way through manufacturing

Therefore,

Physical units in the production = 3,000 units

Equivalently units of production is as follows:

= 70% of Physical units in the production

= 0.7 × 3,000 units

= 2,100 units

Hence, it would be correct to say that the company has 3,000 physical units in the production.

8 0

3 years ago

Fast Auto Service provides a lubrication service for cars. It is known that the mean time taken for this

strojnjashka [21]

Answer:

The answer is below

Explanation:

The z core is used to determine by how many standard deviations the raw score is above or below the mean. The z score is given by:

$z=\frac{x-\mu}{\sigma}\\\\where\ \mu=mean,\sigma=standard\ deviation$ , x = raw score

Given that mean (μ) = 15 minutes per car, standard deviation (σ) = 2.4 minutes.

1) For x > 18:

$z=\frac{x-\mu}{\sigma} =\frac{18-15}{2.4} =1.25$

From normal distribution table, P(x > 18) = P(z > 1.25) = 1 - P(z < 1.25) = 1 - 0.8944 = 0.1056

2) For x < 10:

$z=\frac{x-\mu}{\sigma} =\frac{10-15}{2.4} =-2.08$

From normal distribution table, P(x < 10) = P(z < -2.08) = 0.0188

3) For x > 12:

$z=\frac{x-\mu}{\sigma} =\frac{12-15}{2.4} =-1.25$

For x < 16:

$z=\frac{x-\mu}{\sigma} =\frac{16-15}{2.4} =0.42$

From normal distribution table, P(12 < x < 16) = P(z < 0.42) - P(z < -1.25) = 0.6628 - 0.1056 = 0.5572

6 0

2 years ago

Stonewall Corporation issued $52,000 of 5%, 10-year convertible bonds. Each $1,000 bond is convertible to 10 shares of common st

zalisa [80]

Answer:

A January 1, 2020

Dr Cash $54,600

Cr Bonds payable $52,000

Cr Premium on bonds payable $2,600

B. December 21 2022

Dr Bonds payable $52,000

Dr Premium on bonds payable $1,820

Cr Common stock $26,000

Cr Paid in capital in excess of Par $27,820

Explanation:

Preparation of the entry for Stonewall Corporation

A January 1, 2020

Dr Cash $54,600

($52,000+$2,600)

Cr Bonds payable $52,000

Cr Premium on bonds payable $2,600

(5%*$52,000)

(To record issue of bonds for premium)

B. December 21 2022

Dr Bonds payable $52,000

Dr Premium on bonds payable $1,820

(100%-30%*$2,600)

Cr Common stock $26,000

(52*10*50)

Cr Paid in capital in excess of Par $27,820

($52,000+$1,820-$26,000)

(To record conversion of bonds into Common Stock)

7 0

3 years ago

In January, Tongo, Inc., a branding consultant, had the following transactions. a. Received $15,500 cash for consulting services

Alinara [238K]

Answer:

See the explanation

Explanation:

See the image below:

4 0

3 years ago

During December, the production department of a process operations system completed and transferred to finished goods a total of

slega [8]

Answer:

Direct material cost per equivalent unit = $3.77

Explanation:

<em>Under the weighted average method of valuation, to account for completed units, it is assumed that the entire degree of work required is done in the period under consideration. So there is no separation of the completed units into opening inventory and fully worked.</em>

Cost per equivalent unit = cost / total equivalent units

To determine the direct material cost per equivalent unit, we follow the steps below

Step 1

<em>Determine the total equivalent units</em>

<em>Item Workings Equivalent unit (E.U)</em>

Finished good 100% × 59,000 = 59,000

Closing WIP 50% × 15,000 = 7,500

Total equivalent unit 66,500

Step 2

<em>Determine the cost per equivalent unit</em>

Total direct material cost = $ (60,100 + 190,800)

= $ 250,900

Direct material cost per equivalent unit

= 250,900/66, 500 E.U

= $3.77

Direct material cost per equivalent unit = $3.77

4 0

3 years ago