The findings provided by the Hawthorne studies provided the impetus for the humanistic perspective, despite flawed methodology or inaccurate conclusions.
<h3>What is a Humanist Perspective?</h3>
This refers to the type of perspective that looks at the whole individual and emphasizes on concepts such as free will. Hence, we can see that The findings provided by the Hawthorne studies provided the impetus for the humanistic perspective, despite flawed methodology or inaccurate conclusions.
This is because the humanist perspective has to do with helping people fulfill their potential and maximize their well-being.
Read more about humanist perspective here: brainly.com/question/28193510
#SPJ1
Answer:
An issue-oriented or single-issue party
Explanation:
<u>An issue-oriented party is a party focusing more on the specific issue in question then the general politics, candidate or the party.</u> They are usually single-issue oriented, meaning that they have one goal that they are talking about and fighting for, putting other problems and ideas on the back burner.
In the specific case, we can see the Women-Centric party is formed to increase women's employment. <u>That means they had the specific goal </u>of balancing a number of male and female workers and giving jobs (and with that economic power)to the women. <u>That was their main goal and issue they fought for, making it the center of their party, and therefore making them the issue-oriented party. </u>
I believe the answer is: <span>arbitrary inference
</span><span>arbitrary inference refers to the process of creating a conclusion without sufficient evidences to back it up.
We can see this arbitary interference by observing marta's thought that believe Demerio is </span><span>older and losing my physical abilities without even seeing him doing the task.</span>
term coined in the late 19th century to describe the idea that humans, like animals and plants, compete in a struggle for existence in which natural selection<span> results in "survival of the fittest." Social Darwinists base their beliefs on theories of evolution developed by British naturalist </span>Charles Darwin<span>. Some social Darwinists argue that governments should not interfere with human competition by attempting to regulate the economy or cure social ills such as poverty. Instead, they advocate a </span>laissez-faire<span> political and economic system that favors competition and self-interest in social and business affairs. Social Darwinists typically deny that they advocate a "law of the jungle." But most propose arguments that justify imbalances of power between individuals, races, and nations because they consider some people more fit to survive than others.</span>
<span>
</span>
I believe the answer your looking for is a plateau but you might want to double check.
