The Triple Entente WAS NOT an alliance - nothing was ever signed by Britain.It was an understanding in the early 20th century between Britain,France,and Russia by which they all agreed that none of them liked Germany much,and effectively admitted that they all therefore had a common interest in opposing German aims.
The Triple Alliance was a full alliance between Germany,Austria-Hungary,and Italy signed in 1882,the purpose of which was to keep France isolated.When WW1 began in 1914,Italy welshed on the alliance on the grounds that the war was caused by German aggression (a popular international view long before the Treaty of Versailles).
The way that Lincoln and Douglas view, disagreement and
facts about slavery is that Lincoln views them that they don’t have the ability
to accept or cope up with the moral standards which was opposite of Douglas
thinks. He also views them that they are also avaricious which Douglas didn't
thought of. While Douglas in the other hand, has the belief that the people’s
choice and having the thought of people who are slaves can back down the
movement of the system of labor.
<span />
Generally speaking, Wordsworth's early poems do not yet reflect his ultimate "<span>disillusionment with the outcome of the French Revolution", since this hadn't taken place yet.</span>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can comment on the following things.
The difference between Jefferson's and Henry's evidence of reaction to the colonists' petitions was that Thomas Jefferson decided to draft part of the "Olive Branch Petition" of July 1775, in which American Colonists asked for the support of English King George III to help the colonists and their conditions.
Jefferson's language in the petition was deemed a little bit aggressive, and the draft was edited by John Dickinson, from Pennsylvania.
In the case of Patrick Henry, he was direct and became so famous by his quote of "Gimme liberty or gimme death!"
In both cases, the rhetorical appeal of these speeches relied on Pathos, the rhetorical device that appeals to emotion to convince the audience.
Answer:
Explanation:
The criminal penalty for fraudulently voting when not legally qualified or for voting more than once when qualified is a fine of $300 to $500, one to two years imprisonment, and disenfranchisement
-brainlist
