1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
aleksklad [387]
2 years ago
14

Who were the Puritans and what were their beliefs and practices?

History
2 answers:
Stolb23 [73]2 years ago
8 0

Answer: The Puritans were English Protestants in the 16th and 17th centuries who sought to purify the Church of England of Roman Catholic practices, Typical Puritan beliefs included predestination, an emphasis on plain worship spaces and a strict adherence to the Ten Commandments. The Puritans were English Protestants in the 16th and 17th centuries who disagreed with some of the doctrines of the Anglican Church. They thought of themselves as separatists or reformers.

Hope this helps!

kenny6666 [7]2 years ago
8 0
The puritans were a religious group who wanted to get rid of and purify the Roman Catholic ways of the church
You might be interested in
Which branch makes treaties with other countries?
Usimov [2.4K]

Answer: the executive branch

Explanation: The Constitution gives the Senate the power to approve, by a two-thirds vote, treaties negotiated by the executive branch. The Senate does not ratify treaties.

5 0
2 years ago
Select the items that match Aristotle's definitions of governments. Select all that apply.
SSSSS [86.1K]

Answer:

Rule by a few called an aristocracy, Rule by many called a democracy, rule by many called a polity.

Explanation:

Aristotles believed that the best form of government was a combination of the best aspects of Democracy and Aristocracy, that form would be similar to the Polity.

The rule by one is called a Monarchy, and its negative form is Tyranny.

The rule by a few is called Aristocracy, were the best and wisest are in charge of government. The negative form is called oligarchy. In an oligarchy, a few rule but not in the interest of the common good.

The rule of many is a Polity, and its negative form is a Democracy. Aristotle believed that allowing the direct participation of everyone in a society (Greek democracy was direct) made a city impossible to rule.

6 0
3 years ago
How did FDR's philosophy of government differ from the philosophies of Coolidge and Hoover?
Softa [21]

FDR was a progressive Democrat who firmly believed in the power of a strong Central government to solve the problems of the day.

This differed from Coolidge and Hoover who believed in the power of business to solve problems and saw a limited role for government.

4 0
3 years ago
As the native americans were worked to death and died of disieses what group of people were brought in to replace them as labore
BARSIC [14]

he thoughts and perspectives of indigenous individuals, especially those who lived during the 15th through 19th centuries, have survived in written form less often than is optimal for the historian. Because such documents are extremely rare, those interested in the Native American past also draw information from traditional arts, folk literature, folklore, archaeology, and other sources.

Powhatan village of Secoton

Powhatan village of Secoton

Powhatan village of Secoton, colour engraving by Theodor de Bry, 1590, after a watercolour drawing by John White, c. 1587.

© North Wind Picture Archives

Native American history is made additionally complex by the diverse geographic and cultural backgrounds of the peoples involved. As one would expect, indigenous American farmers living in stratified societies, such as the Natchez, engaged with Europeans differently than did those who relied on hunting and gathering, such as the Apache. Likewise, Spanish conquistadors were engaged in a fundamentally different kind of colonial enterprise than were their counterparts from France or England.

The sections below consider broad trends in Native American history from the late 15th century to the late 20th century. More-recent events are considered in the final part of this article, Developments in the late 20th and early 21st centuries.

North America and Europe circa 1492

The population of Native America

Scholarly estimates of the pre-Columbian population of Northern America have differed by millions of individuals: the lowest credible approximations propose that some 900,000 people lived north of the Rio Grande in 1492, and the highest posit some 18,000,000. In 1910 anthropologist James Mooney undertook the first thorough investigation of the problem. He estimated the precontact population density of each culture area based on historical accounts and carrying capacity, an estimate of the number of people who could be supported by a given form of subsistence. Mooney concluded that approximately 1,115,000 individuals lived in Northern America at the time of Columbian landfall. In 1934 A.L. Kroeber reanalyzed Mooney’s work and estimated 900,000 individuals for the same region and period. In 1966 ethnohistorian Henry Dobyns estimated that there were between 9,800,000 and 12,200,000 people north of the Rio Grande before contact; in 1983 he revised that number upward to 18,000,000 people.

7 0
3 years ago
what are the reasons for the lack of Indian unity in fighting Europeans was that the Indians were descended from different peopl
kap26 [50]

There's multiple reasons for the lack of unity between the Indian tribes against the European invasion and expansion on their territory. The Indians were divided into multiple groups, some of which had already had problems and bad blood between them, so alliances between tribes like that were not the first choice in mind. Also, the Europeans played well tactically, by promising some of the tribes certain things if they ally with them, so once the Europeans managed to get what they wanted they were turning against their Indian allies who were pretty much isolated bu that point because of their actions. The conquering of new territories by the Europeans also was very big factor, because they managed to cut the connections between the tribes, thus not allowing them to be able to create alliances and be united against them.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What happened to the counterculture as the 1970s progressed?
    11·1 answer
  • 1 Nocturnal animals sleep during the day and are awake at night. 2 They have special characteristics that help them get around i
    12·2 answers
  • Why would slaves revolt? Because they needed to organize. Because the emancipation societies promoted it. Because they wanted to
    15·2 answers
  • Public education would be a good example of what kind of power or powers?
    14·2 answers
  • What is one reason why the french colonized louisiana
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following was a consequence of the Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo?
    5·1 answer
  • Who was the 26th president
    15·1 answer
  • Local law defines the speed limit as 45 miles per hour on local roads. The law outlines punishments by charging fines for those
    11·2 answers
  • Stagflation correlates with which of
    8·1 answer
  • 3. What role did the Medici Family play in the start of the Renaissance?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!