1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Murljashka [212]
2 years ago
15

Marbury v. Madison

History
2 answers:
zavuch27 [327]2 years ago
5 0
Majority opinion by John Marshall. Though Marbury was entitled to it, the Court was unable to grant it because Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 conflicted with Article III Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution and was therefore null and void.
jekas [21]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:majority opinion by John Marshall. Though Marbury was entitled to it, the Court was unable to grant it because Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 conflicted with Article III Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution and was therefore null and void.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
How was geographic location important to economic,social,and political development of Ancient Rome?
AleksandrR [38]

Geographic location provided trade and protection.

6 0
4 years ago
What is the difference between the Founding Father's motivations that led to the Revolutionary War and the Secessionist's motiva
rewona [7]

the Revolutionary War with Great Britain was a revolt from overbearing and non-addressed principles while the Civil War was with states who disagreed with the abolishment of subjugation just as certain incongruities in exchange and so forth Yet, they had portrayal in Congress to discuss the issue and come to a typical understanding. They rejected their pledge to maintain the Constitution and the portrayal of individuals. Their withdrawal was naturally illicit wherewith the homesteaders who had no such concurrence with the King of England and Parliament.

5 0
2 years ago
True or False.
NeTakaya

Answer:

True

Explanation:

In 1973 President Nixon signed the Trans-Alaska Pipeline Act into law, in response to the OPEC embargo.

6 0
3 years ago
What was the outcome of the opium wars?
Dafna1 [17]

Answer:

The result of the opium wars was the Treaty of Nanking

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Shortstops?
stiv31 [10]

Answer:

The Answer is A

Explanation:

B is the Pitcher

C is the Catcher

D is an Error

E is a foul ball

F is a ball

G is the Strike Zone

H is pitches inside the zone

I is Umpire

J is a pick off

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The Supreme Court ordered the states to carry out its ruling in Brown v. Board of Education "with all deliberate speed.” This im
    11·1 answer
  • President Johnson did not want to expand the war further as it might provoke a confrontation with the Soviet Union and _____.
    12·1 answer
  • Which three of the following outcomes are associated with European imperialism?
    5·1 answer
  • Describe the difference between donald trump and joe biden. brainliest
    10·1 answer
  • The yellow press in the US helped push the country to war by
    8·1 answer
  • Where did the word viking come from
    10·1 answer
  • 20 POINTS. Graph question
    12·2 answers
  • For what reason did the second Texas president, Mairabeau B. Lamar move the Texas capital from Houston to Austin​
    10·1 answer
  • What does it mean to become secular?
    7·1 answer
  • Which of these was a part of the new Colonization Law of 1825?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!