Answer:
two term limit (in the US, sorry if ur talking about another country but u didn't say so and i live in the US so i just assumed u meant the US)
All through the 17 century, the Colonies had no legitimate government or control. The states were private endeavors with sanctions from the British government; however, nothing came in the method for the supervision of help in light of political strife in Great Britain.
After the chaos over the government was settled, Britain had been changed into a Constitutional Monarchy in which the crown and Parliament together dominated. England currently ended up more grounded and increasingly incorporated.
<u>Answer:</u>
The Industrialization was the shift from around 1760 to 1840 of new production methods in Europe. This transformation included moving from production methods to machines, new production procedures of chemicals and metal production, rising need for water and steam power, advancement of industrial machinery, as well as the surge of mechanized factory system.
The Industrial Revolution also led to rise in the rate of population growth.The technology went from the use of new materials like steel to energy sources such as motor machines like the "steam engine" and coal which was considered the initial engine of the Industrial Revolution.
Answer:
Explanation:In historiography, the term historical revisionism identifies the re-interpretation of an historical account.[1] It usually involves challenging the orthodox (established, accepted or traditional) views held by professional scholars about a historical event or time-span or phenomenon, introducing contrary evidence, or reinterpreting the motivations and decisions of the people involved. The revision of the historical record can reflect new discoveries of fact, evidence, and interpretation, which then results in revised history. In dramatic cases, revisionism involves a reversal of older moral judgments.
At a basic level, legitimate historical revisionism is a common and not especially controversial process of developing and refining the writing of histories. Much more controversial is the reversal of moral findings, whereby what mainstream historians had considered (for example) positive forces are depicted as negative. Such revisionism, if challenged (especially in heated terms) by the supporters of the previous view, can become an illegitimate form of historical revisionism known as historical negationism if it involves inappropriate methods such as:
the use of forged documents or implausible distrust of genuine documents
attributing false conclusions to books and sources
manipulating statistical data
deliberately mis-translating texts
This type of historical revisionism can present a re-interpretation of the moral meaning of the historical record.[2] Negationists use the term "revisionism" to portray their efforts as legitimate historical revisionism. This is especially the case when "revisionism" relates to Holocaust denial.
