I believe that the answer is most likely C.
Answer:
A.
Explanation:
It says earlier in the stanza "the giants of the waste" and "tortured by storms".
This symbolizes that the forest was not at all at peace, then we have a later on much more serene quiet and lovely description.
Answer: D. Updating the line of reasoning in the final paragraph to acknowledge Gallup's contrasting perspective and respond to it.
Explanation:
The options include:
Removing the quotation by Redouan Bshary because his conclusions are at odds with Gallup's
B. Changing the thesis statement to argue that the study was faulty because it did not follow Gallup's methodology
C. Incorporating Gallup's response into the first paragraph after describing his original study on Chimpanzees
D. Updating the line of reasoning in the final paragraph to acknowledge Gallup's contrasting perspective and respond to it
E. Expanding on the description of the cleaner wrasse's penchant for eating parasites off other fish.
The change that the writer will need to make in order for this new information to work in the context of the overall argument the writer is making is to update the line of reasoning in the final paragraph to acknowledge Gallup's contrasting perspective and respond to it.
When this is done, it should be reliable to the readers which can be done by supporting the statement with facts.
It should be noted that the inference about the non-Jewish Germans can be gotten from the context clues in the story.
<h3>What is an inference?</h3>
Your question is incomplete as you didn't providetye passage. Therefore, an overview will be given. An inference simply means the conclusion that's is deduced from the information or evidence given.
It's important to read and understand the passage. You should look out for the theme in the story and the context clues provided. This is vital to get the inference.
Learn more about inference on:
brainly.com/question/25280941
In my opinion, yes and no
