Which two statements explain how racial tensions increased in the United States between 1988 and 1992?

History

1 answer:

Shtirlitz [24]2 years ago

4 0

Two statements that showed how racial tensions increased between 1988 and 1992 include:

The 1988 election ads used stereotypes to help elect Bush.
A highly publicized police brutality incident resulted in no convictions.

<h3>How did racial tensions increase between 1988 and 1992?</h3>

The Willie Horton ads used by the Bush campaign took advantage of the fears that people had about Black people and crime.

The Rodney King arrest was a high profile case that saw him beaten by police men in a brutal manner and yet there were no convictions. This fuel riots.

Find out more on the Rodney King Riots at brainly.com/question/10135114.

You might be interested in

Which leader is most closely associated with

Contact [7]

The leader most closely associated with Desmond Tutu and FW de Klerk is 3. Nelson Mandela. Tutu and De Klerk were both prominent features in South Africa during the period of apartheid. In fact, De Klerk was the leader of South Africa that won a Nobel Peace Prize with Nelson Mandela for ending apartheid and opening elections to native South Africans rather than simply white Afrikaaners in 1994.

7 0

3 years ago

What best describes the state of the Union's economic infrastructure during the Civil War?

GrogVix [38]

Who knows, life is confusing but so is history

3 0

3 years ago

What was a religious goal of the Crusades?

Elan Coil [88]

Answer:
B. to retake control of the Holy Land from the Muslims

8 0

3 years ago

German Foreign Minister Arthur Zimmermann sent _____ to Mexico in an attempt to set up _____.

Allisa [31]

The telegram was sent to Mexico in an attempt to set up Mexico to attack America so that Americans didn't enter the European war

3 0

3 years ago

The skill of corroboration involves

nadya68 [22]

Answer:

The answer is: making sure a conclusion is accurate by checking several sources.

Explanation:

"Corroboration" is a process o<em>f proving a proposition, statement or idea with the help of an evidence.</em> Its purpose is to secure people when it comes to unreasonable sources of evidence (especially when such evidence is used against them).

The skill of corroboration is making sure a conclusion is accurate by checking several sources. This means that it tries to confirm whether the initial evidence is indeed valid, true or verifiable.

Thus, this explains the answer.

5 0

3 years ago