In his argument, Nicholas Carr incorporates other people's viewpoints at the beginning and at the end to effectively support his claims in the article, <em>"Is Go.gle Making Us St.pid."</em>
According to the article, Carr supported his thesis with the viewpoints of others to accord the thesis some credibility. He did this <u>at the beginning and at the end of the article</u>.
But it seems that he did not deal with the opposing viewpoints successfully. The opposing viewpoints should have been presented first and trashed with well-supported views.
As Carr claimed, people have lost their attention span and their ability to read, think, and live their life. The internet of things have assumed greater proportion in people's ability to think deeply.
Thus, Carr should have reworded his article to read like <em>"Is Go.gle Making Us Lazy"</em> instead of st.pid.
"Teens don't value sleep because there's too many things going on to distract
Explanation:
The question is asking what claim is saying the importance of health (sleep) and a video game. The others are just saying wishing video games were gone or how much kids play.
