In his argument, Nicholas Carr incorporates other people's viewpoints at the beginning and at the end to effectively support his claims in the article, <em>"Is Go.gle Making Us St.pid."</em>
According to the article, Carr supported his thesis with the viewpoints of others to accord the thesis some credibility. He did this <u>at the beginning and at the end of the article</u>.
But it seems that he did not deal with the opposing viewpoints successfully. The opposing viewpoints should have been presented first and trashed with well-supported views.
As Carr claimed, people have lost their attention span and their ability to read, think, and live their life. The internet of things have assumed greater proportion in people's ability to think deeply.
Thus, Carr should have reworded his article to read like <em>"Is Go.gle Making Us Lazy"</em> instead of st.pid.
<span>The analysis of how people relate to each other is known as A) human resources. B) anthropology. C) reinforcement. D) human relations. Helpful?</span>
