Answer:
Labour rate variance $2,925 unfavorable
Explanation:
<em>The labour rate variance is the difference between the standard labour cost allowed for the actual hours worked and the actual labor cost for the same hours</em>
$
Standard labour cost ($19.70× 6500) 128,050
Actual labour cost <u>130,975</u>
Labour rate variance <u> 2,925 unfavorable</u>
Answer:
$1.8 Unfavourable
Explanation:
Labor usage variance can be calculated by deducting Standard hours from Actual hours and multiplying the result by the standard rate.
DATA
Standard hours = 1.50 hours
Standard rate = $12/hour
Actual hours = 1.65 hours
Actual rate = $11.5/hour
Calculation
LABOUR USAGE VARIANCE = (SH-AH)SR
LABOUR USAGE VARIANCE =(1.5 - 1.65) x $12
LABOUR USAGE VARIANCE = (-0.15) x $12
LABOUR USAGE VARIANCE = $1.8 Unfavourable
Answer:
The correct option is (c)
Explanation:
A leader who displays directing leader style gives particular instructions to the subordinates and clearly defines roles and tasks assigned to them. He supervises the tasks performed by the subordinates.
The leader makes all decisions and communicate the same to the subordinates so it is a one-way communication as he does not seek feedback from the them.
Here, Barney displays directing leader style as he is more task oriented and not relationship oriented. He has clearly stated the tasks and deadlines to the subordinates.
Answer:
Explanation:
For computing the incremental effect on the company's overall profit between reworking and selling the material rather than selling it as is as scrap, we have to do the comparison between these two.
The calculation is shown below:
= Scrap value of material - rework sale value
= $30,100 - $30,800
= - $700
The other items which are shown in the question are irrelevant for comparison. Thus, it is ignored.
Hence, the incremental effect on the company's overall profit of reworking and selling the material rather than selling it as is as scrap is show a loss of $700
Answer: deceptive pricing
Explanation:
Overall, the answer could be deduced from the defenitions of those terms.
We can surely exclude green washing, which basically means that the product is sold under "eco", "green" label, when it is not. Puffery is a legal practise, which can not be proven to be true or false; which is clearly not the case in this example.
Now we are left with three categories of deceptive marketing practices. Deceptive packaging means that the product does not fit the image peceived from its package. This might be the design, the size, the picture of the product, etc. Deceptive promotion means that the information on the ads is inaccurate, partly withhold, or false. Deceptive pricing means that the seller offers the product at lower price. This can be done by promoting low price for low-in-stock or out-of stock items and then offering the substituent products of the same category, which are surely more expensive.
