Considering the situation described above, this is a <u>Macro-level approach</u>, and the theoretical approach to sociology <em>Durkheim</em> was using is <u>Structural Functionalism.</u>
<h3>What is a Macro-Level Approach in Sociology?</h3>
The <em><u>macro-level approach</u></em> or theory assesses how the entire society or community interacts, usually between the components such as people and the environments.
Similarly, <u>Structural </u><u>Functionalism</u> is one of the <em><u>Macro-Level</u></em> Approaches that focus on society and its components.
Given that Durkheim focused on the way each segment of society does its part, as members of a team, this is an example of Structural Functionalism.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that Durkheim used <em><u>Structural Functionalism</u></em> to understand his study, a form of <em><u>Macro-Level approach</u></em>.
Learn more about Macro-Level Approach here: brainly.com/question/8202286
I did this a couple of weeks ago...
The spirit of Saint Benedict's Rule is summed up in the motto of the Benedictine Confederation: pax ("peace") and the traditional ora et labora ("pray and work"). Compared to other precepts, the Rule provides a moderate path between individual zeal and formulaic institutionalism; because of this middle ground it has been widely popular. Benedict's concerns were the needs of monks in a community environment: namely, to establish due order, to foster an understanding of the relational nature of human beings, and to provide a spiritual father to support and strengthen the individual's ascetic effort and the spiritual growth that is required for the fulfillment of the human vocation, theosis.
The Rule of Saint Benedict has been used by Benedictines for 15 centuries, and thus St. Benedict is sometimes regarded as the founder of Western monasticism due to reform that his rules had on the current Catholic hierarchy.[2] There is, however, no evidence to suggest that Benedict intended to found a religious order in the modern sense and it was not until the Late Middle Ages that mention was made of an "Order of Saint Benedict". His Rule was written as a guide for individual, autonomous communities, and all Benedictine Houses (and the Congregations in which they have grouped themselves) still remain self-governing. Advantages seen in retaining this unique Benedictine emphasis on autonomy include cultivating models of tightly bonded communities and contemplative lifestyles. Perceived disadvantages comprise geographical isolation from important activities in adjacent communities. Other perceived losses include inefficiency and lack of mobility in the service of others, and insufficient appeal to potential members. These different emphases emerged within the framework of the Rule in the course of history and are to some extent present within the Benedictine Confederation and the Cistercian Orders of the Common and the Strict Observance.
Hmm.. ive struggled with this question (only from i didn't read or do the papers on it) when i looked it up there was three themes. forgiveness and empathy, the power of love and trust and Christian charity
