You can just be like something like that happened to me and explain it then relate how it goes with what is happening with them
Answer:
Let's remember that Bartleby was a homeless man. He lived in the narrator's office. He never left, and 'preferred not to' do anything. I think that the moral of this story is never to judge someone by their behaviour. The narrator didn't know what kind of man Bartleby was until he saw that Bartleby never left. He's mysterious. He's just some guy who doesn't know how to do the scrivening job, but stays employed to the narrator because he has been provided with a room and food.
Explanation:
“Will you tell me, Bartleby, where you were born?”
“I would prefer not to.”
“Will you tell me any thing about yourself?”
“I would prefer not to.”
Because when you use a different language it gives the monster a sense of things like mystery dominance fear power or intelligence which can make for a great plot or even a good plot twist. Hope this helps!
Answer choice B would be the correct answer.
It's great that the author has excellent credentials and the article is well written, but the fact that they are using outdated information is not worthy to be given credit to.
Using the article even though it's outdated would only harm you and affect your grade of the research project. You always want the correct and dated information.
Therefore, answer choice B is the best answer.
Answer:
B1: would keep it.
B2: would you do
A3: sell it.
Explanation:
It's an opinion question - this is what I would say.
