Answer:
C. Most people used the reply all button
Explanation:
This is a problem that can occur in companies due to misuse of e-mail functionalities. What happened in this case was that the employees who responded to the HR director's request email, used the reply button to all contacts forwarded in the director's original email, which ends up creating an email chain unnecessary and can hinder and delay the work of other employees, who need to see emails related to their role.
Therefore, the essential thing is that each employee makes use of the e-mail tool effectively, responding only to the recipient of the e-mail and avoiding sending unnecessary and private messages to contacts not interested in the professional subject addressed in the e-mail.
Answer:
Resources are limited in supply(scarcity) while wants are unlimited thus one has to make a choice to satisfy a need.Some choices are forgone(opportunity cost)
Answer:
the weighted mean price per share is $38.76
Explanation:
The computation of the weighted mean price per share is given below:
= (200 shares × $37 per share + 270 shares × $36 per share + 490 shares × $41 per share) ÷ (200 shares + 270 shares + 490 shares)
= ($7,400 + $9,720 + $20,090) ÷ (960 shares)
= $37,210 ÷ 960 shares
= $38.76
Hence, the weighted mean price per share is $38.76
Answer:
$5 million
Explanation:
If we follow the Coase Theorem, the appropriate solution to this case should be obtained regardless of initial rights. In this case, the factory saves $5 million to the producer, but it costs $10 million to Boston residents. if Boston residents pay $5 million or more to the factory owner, then both would benefit. Boston residents will gain $10 - $5 = $5 million, as well as the factory owner.
Answer:
Answer Illustration : Opportunity Cost of producing Wine is lesser in France, Opportunity Cost of producing Sweaters is lesser in Tunisia. So, France has comparative advantage in Wine, Tunisia in Sweater.
Explanation:
Opportunity Cost is the cost of next best alternative foregone while choosing an alternative.
Opportunity Cost of producing Sweaters & Wine in France & Tunisia are quantities of other goods (Sweaters or Tunias) sacrifised while choosing either. Sweater Opportunity Cost - Wines sacrifised, Wine Opportunity Cost - Sweaters sacrifised.
The country has a comparative advantage in a good if it can produce it with relatively less opportunity cost (in terms of other good sacrifised) than other country.
Ex : Production Possibilities
Wine Sweater Trade off (Wine :Sweater)
France 10 5 1:0.5 or 2:1
Tunisia 8 24 1:3 or 0.33:1
- France produces Wine with lesser opportunity cost (sweater sacrifised) than Tunisia [0.5 sweater < 3 sweaters] ; it has comparative advantage in Wine.
- Tunisia produces Sweater with less opportunity cost (wine sacrifised) than France [ 0.33 wine < 2 wines] ; it has comparative advantage in Tunisia
